FIA and ISDA have responded to ESMA’s consultation on their “Draft Guidelines on common procedures and methodologies on supervisory review and evaluation process of CCPs under Article 21 of EMIR”. The associations support standardisation of scope and depth of these reviews. Clearing participants rely on the CCP reviews by national competent authorities and believe that standardisation and improvement of these reviews is important in view of recent defaults at European CCPs, which at least initially required the use of the default fund. The associations recommend that these reviews are not restricted to the elements set out in the consultation, but should holistically review whether the risk management framework is fit for purpose.
Documents (1) for FIA and ISDA Respond to ESMA’s Draft Guidelines of Supervisory Review of CCPs
Latest
ISDA In Review – December 2025
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in December 2025.
Response to EC on Market Risk Prudential Framework
On January 6, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) and the Institute of International Finance (IIF) submitted a joint response to the European Commission’s (EC) targeted consultation on the application of the market risk prudential framework. ISDA,...
Updated OTC Derivatives Compliance Calendar
ISDA has updated its global calendar of compliance deadlines and regulatory dates for the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives space.
Response on CCP Participation Requirements
On December 24, ISDA responded to a consultation from the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on central counterparty (CCP) participation requirements. Participation requirements for CCPs are vital for safe and efficient clearing markets, and ISDA broadly supports ESMA’s consultation...