It is important that EMIR address intragroup transactions in a way that is (a) proportionate and appropriate for the real level of risk involved (taking into account that the client–facing transactions will be either cleared or bilaterally margined (depending on whether the contract is clearing-eligible) and these are internal group back-to-back transactions, which do not increase inter-connectedness in the financial system) and (b) internationally coherent, in such a way that European and US (and other) financial groups can continue to compete for clients on a safe basis, and ensuring that risk management is not compartmentalised geographically (EMIR should not promote trade barriers).
Documents (1) for ISDA-AFMR brief on intragroup transactions (EMIR) of 12 May 2011
Latest
Trading Book Capital: Scott O'Malia Remarks
Trading Book Capital: Capital Conundrum, Navigating Basel III Endgame February 5, 2026 Welcoming Remarks Scott O’Malia, ISDA Chief Executive Good afternoon, and welcome to ISDA’s Trading Book Capital event – it’s great to be here in New York. We...
ISDA In Review – January 2026
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in January 2026.
ISDA Responds to RBI Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI) Proposals
On November 14, 2025, ISDA submitted comments to a Draft Circular from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) proposing to mandate the global Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI) for all transactions in OTC markets for Rupee interest rate derivatives, forward contracts in Government...
How and Why Pension Funds Use Derivatives
With over $58 trillion in assets globally, pension fund managers are major participants in financial markets and play a vital role in helping to provide post-retirement incomes for plan employees. Meeting such an important goal requires careful consideration of investment...