It’s hard to overstate the amount of nonsensical chatter on credit default swaps (CDS) in the past few days. At the top of our list is a column by physicist Mark Buchanan in Bloomberg BusinessWeek. It says that CDS make today’s sovereign debt crisis “different – and possibly more dangerous” because they create a “largely invisible network of ties among institutions around the world, which could ultimately cause global financial chaos.” That’s because CDS are “mostly arranged ‘over-the-counter,’ not traded on any exchange or recorded by any central information repository.”
Really?
Does the author not know about DTCC’s CDS Trade Information Warehouse? (For that matter, doesn’t anyone at Bloomberg BusinessWeek know about it either?) It’s only been up and running since 2008, capturing more than 98% of all CDS transactions. Its launch may not have rivaled the neutrino time trials recently carried out by CERN in Europe. But surely its existence should be known to someone purporting to be an expert on the CDS market.
The CDS warehouse offers a significant level of regulatory transparency and helps to ensure that AIG can’t happen again. Some of the information it captures is public and is available here.
Note in Table 6 of the DTCC data that the net notional on Greek debt currently measures US$3.7 billion. This figure is calculated by summing the net exposures of the protection sellers, so it is impossible for any one firm selling protection to have more than $3.7bn in exposure. Of course, given that there are many net sellers, any one seller’s exposure is likely to be far less.
Also, firms’ net exposures are partially offset by the recovery value of the underlying obligations. For example, if the post-default recovery value of Greek debt was (hypothetically) 50%, the maximum aggregate amount payable would be 50% of $3.7 billion, or $1.85 billion. Furthermore, statistics indicate that, on average, 70 per cent of derivatives exposure is collateralised and the level of CDS collateralization is likely to be even higher as over 90% of CDS transactions (by numbers of trades) are collateralised. Thus, in this example, of the $1.85bn that would be payable, about $1.5bn is secured.
So please, let’s stop the nonsense. There are serious issues to be discussed regarding global regulatory reform and the financial markets. Greater transparency and the threat of CDS contagion in the event of a Greek default aren’t among them.
Latest
Response to Eurosystem Consultation on Appia
On April 22, ISDA responded to the Eurosystem consultation on the Appia roadmap. ISDA broadly supports the roadmap and its high level principles, while recommending that the principle on market access and integration should be expanded to explicitly address interoperability...
ISDA Responds to ESMA on PTRR Clearing Exemption
On April 20, ISDA submitted a response to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) consultation paper on a draft regulatory technical standard (RTS) for the post-trade risk reduction (PTRR) exemption from the derivatives clearing obligation under Article 4b of the...
Response on Competitiveness of EU Banking Sector
On April 17, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) targeted consultation on the competitiveness of the EU banking sector. The EU is aiming to bolster the ability of its financial markets and banking sector to grow, remain competitive and...
India Forum Scott O'Malia Opening Remarks
India Derivatives Markets Forum April 16, 2026 Opening Remarks Scott O’Malia, ISDA Chief Executive Good morning and welcome. This is the third year we’ve run the India Derivatives Markets Forum, and the number of people attending has grown each...
