This paper describes a risk reduction practice, portfolio compression (compression), which is conducted in the interest rate swap (IRS) market. Compression enables swap dealers with substantial two-way (pay and receive) swap activity to terminate substantial amounts of swap contracts before they expire by their terms. The benefits of compression include reductions in counterparty credit exposure, operational risk and cost, as well as lower legal and administrative expenses in the event of a default of any participating dealer. Importantly, since contracts are actually eliminated, under some regimes capital costs can be reduced. Together with expanded clearing of IRS, compression produces tremendous reduction of risk in the derivatives marketplace.
Compression was introduced to the IRS market in 2003 by TriOptima. Through year-end 2011, participating institutions have eliminated $164 trillion of notional principal outstanding with $56 trillion compressed in 2011 alone. Much of the recent progress has been the result of collaboration between TriOptima and LCH.Clearnet Ltd.’s swap clearing service, SwapClear. We estimate that without compression, the size of the IRS market would be approximately 30% larger.
While results have been very positive, challenges remain to improve the scope of compression. Meeting these challenges could result in a marked increase in compression, and might very well enable the derivatives market to shrink in terms of notional outstanding even as annual activity increases.
Documents (1) for Interest Rate Swaps Compression: A Progress Report
Latest
ISDA Clearing Model Comparison
On February 1, 2024, ISDA published a comparison of available US Treasury (UST) clearing models, as well as models for clearing repos at other central counterparties (CCPs) globally and models for clearing derivatives. This comparison is intended to help market...
FRTB Impact on Correlation Trading
The capitalization of the correlation trading portfolio (CTP) under the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book will have an adverse economic impact for users of these instruments. In particular, there is a lack of clarity and consistency in the application...
ISDA In Review – September 2025
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in September 2025.
A Path to Greater CFTC-SEC Alignment
Earlier this week, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) held a roundtable on regulatory harmonization – an initiative we wholeheartedly support. The US regulatory framework has evolved over time to facilitate financial markets...