ISDA and AFME response to the EC re. compromise draft on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties

ISDA and AFME wrote to the European Commission (“EC”) regarding the EC compromise draft on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties (“CCPs”) in the Capital Requirements Regulation (“Draft CRR Text”) observing a number of differences between the Draft CRR Text and the Basel international standards set out in the interim framework for determining capital requirements for bank exposures to CCPs, viz. BCBS 227 of July 2012.

Tags:

Documents (1) for ISDA and AFME response to the EC re. compromise draft on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties

ISDA Comments on Executive Order 14219

On October 23, ISDA’s North American Tax Working Group (NATWG) submitted comments in response to the US Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service statement regarding taxpayer recommendations on regulations identified under Executive Order 14219, ensuring lawful governance and...