ISDA and AFME wrote to the European Commission (“EC”) regarding the EC compromise draft on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties (“CCPs”) in the Capital Requirements Regulation (“Draft CRR Text”) observing a number of differences between the Draft CRR Text and the Basel international standards set out in the interim framework for determining capital requirements for bank exposures to CCPs, viz. BCBS 227 of July 2012.
Documents (1) for ISDA and AFME response to the EC re. compromise draft on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties
Latest
ISDA Responds to RBI Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI) Proposals
On November 14, 2025, ISDA submitted comments to a Draft Circular from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) proposing to mandate the global Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI) for all transactions in OTC markets for Rupee interest rate derivatives, forward contracts in Government...
How and Why Pension Funds Use Derivatives
With over $58 trillion in assets globally, pension fund managers are major participants in financial markets and play a vital role in helping to provide post-retirement incomes for plan employees. Meeting such an important goal requires careful consideration of investment...
Updated OTC Derivatives Compliance Calendar
ISDA has updated its global calendar of compliance deadlines and regulatory dates for the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives space.
Climate Risk Scenario Analysis Phase 4
Climate scenario analysis has become a useful tool for banks and financial institutions to understand the short- and long-term financial risks associated with climate change, particularly in light of evolving regulations and an increased emphasis on reducing the impact of...