ISDA and AFME wrote to the European Commission (“EC”) regarding the EC compromise draft on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties (“CCPs”) in the Capital Requirements Regulation (“Draft CRR Text”) observing a number of differences between the Draft CRR Text and the Basel international standards set out in the interim framework for determining capital requirements for bank exposures to CCPs, viz. BCBS 227 of July 2012.
Documents (1) for ISDA and AFME response to the EC re. compromise draft on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties
Latest
Trading Book Capital: Scott O'Malia Remarks
Trading Book Capital: Capital Conundrum, Navigating Basel III Endgame February 5, 2026 Welcoming Remarks Scott O’Malia, ISDA Chief Executive Good afternoon, and welcome to ISDA’s Trading Book Capital event – it’s great to be here in New York. We...
ISDA In Review – January 2026
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in January 2026.
ISDA Responds to RBI Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI) Proposals
On November 14, 2025, ISDA submitted comments to a Draft Circular from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) proposing to mandate the global Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI) for all transactions in OTC markets for Rupee interest rate derivatives, forward contracts in Government...
How and Why Pension Funds Use Derivatives
With over $58 trillion in assets globally, pension fund managers are major participants in financial markets and play a vital role in helping to provide post-retirement incomes for plan employees. Meeting such an important goal requires careful consideration of investment...