ISDA and AFME wrote to the European Commission (“EC”) regarding the EC compromise draft on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties (“CCPs”) in the Capital Requirements Regulation (“Draft CRR Text”) observing a number of differences between the Draft CRR Text and the Basel international standards set out in the interim framework for determining capital requirements for bank exposures to CCPs, viz. BCBS 227 of July 2012.
Documents (1) for ISDA and AFME response to the EC re. compromise draft on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties
Latest
Joint Comment Letter on Basel III Endgame Proposal
The Institute of International Finance (IIF), the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) today submitted a joint comment letter to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the...
Joint Response to 2026 US Basel III Proposal
On June 18, ISDA, the Institute for International Finance and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association submitted a joint response to the 2026 US Basel III notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR). The response focuses on the Fundamental Review of...
Response to EC Consultation on Carbon Price
On June 10, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the calculation of the carbon price paid in a third country under Article 9 of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). ISDA supports the EC’s proposal that evidence...
Response to CFTC on Clearing Requirements
On June 11, ISDA responded to the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s notice of proposed rulemaking on the clearing requirement determination under Section 2(h) of the Commodity Exchange Act for interest rate swaps to account for Canadian dollar-denominated and Mexican...