ISDA & GFMA submit comments to the BCBS on Recognizing Cost of Credit Protection Purchased

On June 21, ISDA and GFMA provided comments to the BCBS in response to their consultation document Recognizing Cost of Credit Protection Purchased (published 22 March 2013). Industry were concerned that the proposed rule would have a disproportionate effect on a wide range of banks’ financing activities (both in corporate and investment banking), wherever banks seek to hedge borrower credit risk or associated counterparty risk. In addition the groups voiced concerns about synthetic securitization transactions, non-securitization transactions, the potential impact of changes to the accounting standards affecting loan loss reserves and additional questions posed in the BCBS Consultation Document.

Documents (1) for ISDA & GFMA submit comments to the BCBS on Recognizing Cost of Credit Protection Purchased

Response to BoE on Systemic Stablecoins

On February 10, ISDA responded to the Bank of England’s (BoE) consultation on a proposed regulatory regime for sterling-denominated systemic stablecoins. In the response, ISDA highlights that any regulatory framework should be assessed through the lens of prudent risk management...

SwapsInfo Full Year 2025 and Q4 2025

Trading activity in interest rate derivatives (IRD) and credit derivatives increased in 2025, reflecting shifting monetary policy expectations and broader market conditions. IRD traded notional rose by about 46% year-on-year, led by an increase in overnight index swaps (OIS). Index...

Maintaining Focus on Basel III Endgame Recalibration

In its original form, the US Basel III endgame proposal would have resulted in disproportionate increases in capital for trading book activities, forcing banks to make difficult choices about their participation in certain businesses. After two-and-a-half years, a revised proposal...