CCPs will be required to establish robust recovery, continuity and resolution mechanisms. These must be addressed in relation to two situations: (1) at the “end of the default waterfall”; and (2) where there are non-default losses (NDL) that exceed a clearinghouse’s financial resources above the minimum regulatory capital requirements. This paper is in response to industry efforts to develop an effective recovery, continuity and resolution framework for central counterparties and reflects consensus views of the ISDA Risk and Margin Regulatory Implementation Committee (RIC).
Documents (1) for CCP Loss Allocation at the End of the Waterfall
Latest
Response to Voluntary Carbon Markets Consultation
On July 10, ISDA responded to the UK government’s consultation on voluntary carbon and nature markets. The UK should continue to play a leading role in promoting the consistent legal treatment of carbon credits internationally, with the development of global...
ISDA Response – ROC Consultation on Revised CDE Version 4
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) response to the Regulatory Oversight Committee (ROC) consultation on the harmonisation of critical OTC derivatives data elements (CDE) revised CDE Technical Guidance – version 4, submitted to the ROC on January 24,...
ISDA response to ESMA MiFIR Review Consultation
On July 11, ISDA submitted a response to the European Securities and Markets Authority's (ESMA) fourth package of Level 2 consultation under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation Review (MiFIR), on transparency for derivatives, package orders and input/output data for...
Canadian Transaction Reporting Party Requirements
These Reporting Party Requirements establish the hierarchy and tie-breaker logic to determine a single reporting counterparty for Canadian provincial reporting. By leveraging the existing reporting party standard established for reporting to the CFTC, in most cases these rules facilitate submission...