ISDA/IIF response to BCBS Discussion Paper – The Regulatory Framework: Balancing Risk Sensitivity, Simplicity and Comparability

On October 11, ISDA & The Institute of International Finance (IIF) responded to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) Discussion Paper ‘The Regulatory Framework: Balancing Risk Sensitivity, Simplicity and Comparability’. The response focuses on the ramifications of changes to the current framework for member institutions and the broader financial system, and considers possibilities going forward that would capture perceived deficiencies in the risk based framework whilst not jeopardizing the objectives of risk sensitivity and transparency.

Documents (1) for ISDA/IIF response to BCBS Discussion Paper – The Regulatory Framework: Balancing Risk Sensitivity, Simplicity and Comparability

Response to BoE on Systemic Stablecoins

On February 10, ISDA responded to the Bank of England’s (BoE) consultation on a proposed regulatory regime for sterling-denominated systemic stablecoins. In the response, ISDA highlights that any regulatory framework should be assessed through the lens of prudent risk management...

SwapsInfo Full Year 2025 and Q4 2025

Trading activity in interest rate derivatives (IRD) and credit derivatives increased in 2025, reflecting shifting monetary policy expectations and broader market conditions. IRD traded notional rose by about 46% year-on-year, led by an increase in overnight index swaps (OIS). Index...

Maintaining Focus on Basel III Endgame Recalibration

In its original form, the US Basel III endgame proposal would have resulted in disproportionate increases in capital for trading book activities, forcing banks to make difficult choices about their participation in certain businesses. After two-and-a-half years, a revised proposal...