On January 30, ISDA responded to the UK Fair and Effective Markets Review (FEMR). ISDA raised the following issues: new rules should be considered after an assessment of the impact of current regulatory reforms; ill-considered cross-border regulation reduces competition and balkanizes markets; and standardization is more appropriate for some FICC markets than others. It would also not be appropriate to include undertakings to comply with a market code into contracts, as it could create market and legal risks.
Documents (1) for ISDA responds to Fair and Effective Markets Review
Latest
ISDA Launches Digital Emissions Definitions
ISDA has launched a natively digital version of its documentation for emissions allowance transactions, enabling the framework to be updated more efficiently as emissions trading systems (ETSs) evolve. The 2026 ISDA Emissions Transactions Definitions provide standardized documentation for physically settled...
Scott O’Malia Opening Remarks
ISDA Derivatives Trading and Treasury Forum London, September 30, 2026 Opening Remarks Scott O’Malia ISDA Chief Executive Good morning, and welcome to the ISDA Derivatives Trading and Treasury Forum. Thanks for joining us today, and a big thank you...
US Treasury Repo Clearing Indicators August 2026
The ISDA-Actrix US Treasury Repo Market Clearing Indicators illustrate central clearing adoption in the US Treasury repo market. Sponsored cleared repo volumes are used as a proxy to monitor client participation in central clearing, a key objective of the Securities...
Pursuing Efficiencies of Tokenization
As we mark the 10-year anniversary of the ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (ISDA SIMM), which was launched in September 2016 to coincide with the first phase of initial margin (IM) requirements for non-cleared derivatives, we’ve been reflecting on its...