The scope of products subject to the proposed margin requirements is not consistent across the EU, Japan and the US. The inconsistency in the margin product set raises problems for both VM and IM calculation, in addition to other cross-border situations. ISDA respectfully advises the regulators that for any counterparty pair, ISDA members intend to mitigate this issue by choosing whether to use a broader product set rather than the set required by any specific regulation, in order to ensure the parties capture all in scope products.
Documents (1) for ISDA letter to global regulators on the use of a broad product set for purposes of margin calculation
Latest
ISDA AGM Studio: Joana Schlenczek & Nate Wuerffel
Joana Schlenczek, ISDA board member and head of FI rates structuring and client solutions at Santander Corporate & Investment Banking, and Nate Wuerffel, global head of market structure and head of product, global collateral, at BNY, speak with Panayiotis Dionysopoulos,...
ISDA AGM Studio: Scott O’Malia and Mark Uyeda, SEC
Mark Uyeda, commissioner at the US Securities and Exchange Commission, speaks with ISDA CEO Scott O’Malia about implementation of the US Treasury clearing mandate and how the SEC is thinking about extraterritorial reach and the treatment of interaffiliate trades.
ISDA AGM Studio: David Bailey
David Bailey, executive director, prudential policy, at the Bank of England, speaks with ISDA CEO Scott O’Malia about the UK’s approach to Basel 3.1, the impact of the revised US Basel III endgame on cross‑border consistency and the role of the...
ISDA AGM Studio: Harleen Bains and Sonali Das Theisen
How have trading desks responding to increased market volatility this year? Harleen Bains, ISDA board member and head of global markets sales, Canada, at RBC Capital Markets, and Sonali Das Theisen, global head of FICC e‑trading and markets strategic investments...