This paper examines some factors that central counterparties (CCPs) should consider in structuring partial tear-up methodologies so as not to contravene rules on offsetting under the applicable accounting standards, which would render cleared derivatives uneconomical. The paper notes that CCPs can structure partial tear-up in a number of ways. Whatever the structure, the CCP’s methodology for partial tear-up should be transparent, written in its rule book, available to all potentially affected parties and should respect US GAAP and IFRS accounting standards.
Documents (1) for Consideration of Accounting Analysis for CCP Recovery and Continuity Tools
Latest
Response on Proposed Changes to Transaction Rules
On May 22, ISDA and the Global Foreign Exchange Division (GFXD) of the Global Financial Markets Association submitted a joint response to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) consultation on proposed changes to the ASIC Derivative Transaction Rules (Reporting)...
EBA FRTB-ASA Benchmarking Support for Newly In-scope Banks
A new regulatory requirement is expected to bring additional EU banks into scope for submitting Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) Alternative Standardized Approach (ASA) capital as part of the European Banking Authority’s (EBA) benchmarking exercise. ISDA Capital Models...
Joint Letter on Sunset of Swaps TR Rules
On May 20, ISDA, FIA and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) submitted a joint letter to US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to request the CFTC to sunset large trader reporting rules (LTR) rules for physical commodity...
ISDA, SIFMA Letter on SEC-CFTC Harmonization
On May 19, ISDA and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) submitted a joint letter to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on SEC and CFTC harmonization, as part...