This paper examines some factors that central counterparties (CCPs) should consider in structuring partial tear-up methodologies so as not to contravene rules on offsetting under the applicable accounting standards, which would render cleared derivatives uneconomical. The paper notes that CCPs can structure partial tear-up in a number of ways. Whatever the structure, the CCP’s methodology for partial tear-up should be transparent, written in its rule book, available to all potentially affected parties and should respect US GAAP and IFRS accounting standards.
Documents (1) for Consideration of Accounting Analysis for CCP Recovery and Continuity Tools
Latest
IRD Trading in Mainland China and Hong Kong
This report examines interest rate derivatives (IRD) trading activity in mainland China and Hong Kong in the first half of 2026. Onshore renminbi (RMB) IRD traded notional in mainland China rose to $3.4 trillion in the first half of 2026,...
ISDA In Review – October 2026
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in October 2026.
ISDA Recommendations on EMIR under MISP
On November 2, ISDA published its recommendations on the European Parliament compromise amendments to the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) under the Market Integration and Supervision Package (MISP). The briefing covers five areas: transaction reporting (Article 9), non-financial counterparties (Article...
Response on UK MIFIR Reporting Guidelines
On November 6, ISDA responded to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) consultation CP26/34 ‘Preparing for the new transaction reporting regime’ on the upcoming changes to the UK Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MIFIR) transaction reporting regime, as set out in...