This paper examines some factors that central counterparties (CCPs) should consider in structuring partial tear-up methodologies so as not to contravene rules on offsetting under the applicable accounting standards, which would render cleared derivatives uneconomical. The paper notes that CCPs can structure partial tear-up in a number of ways. Whatever the structure, the CCP’s methodology for partial tear-up should be transparent, written in its rule book, available to all potentially affected parties and should respect US GAAP and IFRS accounting standards.
Documents (1) for Consideration of Accounting Analysis for CCP Recovery and Continuity Tools
Latest
ISDA Comment on ICC Application as Clearing Agency
On October 6 ISDA submitted a comment letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission in response to the ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) application for registration as a clearing agency under Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including...
Paper on Enhancing Liquidity and Risk Management
As ISDA marks its 40th anniversary this year, it is an opportune time to reflect on the challenges and opportunities faced by the global derivatives markets over the past four decades. Rapid growth, continued innovation, regulatory reform, central clearing, margining,...
Trade Bodies Seek Delay on Third-Country CCP Rules
On October 21, ISDA and nine other trade associations – the Alternative Investment Management Association, the European Association of Co-operative Banks, the European Association of Corporate Treasurers, the European Banking Federation, the European Fund and Asset Management Association, the European...
ISDA and Tokenovate Launch CDM Taskforce
ISDA and Tokenovate have today announced the establishment of a new taskforce within the Fintech Open Source Foundation (FINOS) to accelerate operationalization of the Common Domain Model (CDM). The initiative responds to growing market demand for standardized, interoperable post-trade processing...