This paper examines some factors that central counterparties (CCPs) should consider in structuring partial tear-up methodologies so as not to contravene rules on offsetting under the applicable accounting standards, which would render cleared derivatives uneconomical. The paper notes that CCPs can structure partial tear-up in a number of ways. Whatever the structure, the CCP’s methodology for partial tear-up should be transparent, written in its rule book, available to all potentially affected parties and should respect US GAAP and IFRS accounting standards.
Documents (1) for Consideration of Accounting Analysis for CCP Recovery and Continuity Tools
Latest
ISDA Position Paper on EC's MISP Proposal
On 20 March 2026, ISDA shared its position paper on Better Regulation and Supervision in the European Commission’s Market Integration and Supervision Package (MISP) proposal with relevant decision-makers in the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission, outlining reform...
Gentek AI Selected to Develop DRR Traceability
ISDA has selected Gentek AI to develop a new traceability tool for the ISDA Digital Regulatory Reporting (DRR) solution, enhancing transparency for users of the ISDA DRR. The traceability tool will allow users to look back at the history of...
ISDA Guidance: SOFR Publication on Good Friday 2026
ISDA guidance for parties to over-the-counter derivative transactions affected by expected non-publication of SOFR on Good Friday in 2026. Please note that the guidance may be updated from time to time.
ISDA Paper on FRTB Rules in Brazil
On March 24, ISDA submitted a paper to Banco Central do Brazil’s (BCB) on its implementation of the revised market risk framework under the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB), which represents an important step toward strengthening prudential standards...