This paper examines some factors that central counterparties (CCPs) should consider in structuring partial tear-up methodologies so as not to contravene rules on offsetting under the applicable accounting standards, which would render cleared derivatives uneconomical. The paper notes that CCPs can structure partial tear-up in a number of ways. Whatever the structure, the CCP’s methodology for partial tear-up should be transparent, written in its rule book, available to all potentially affected parties and should respect US GAAP and IFRS accounting standards.
Documents (1) for Consideration of Accounting Analysis for CCP Recovery and Continuity Tools
Latest
Response to MAS on Treatment of Crypto Assets
On May 15, ISDA and the Asia Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association submitted a joint response to the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) consultation, published in April 2026, on the prudential treatment of crypto assets on permissionless blockchains, welcoming MAS’s more...
Joint Response to EC on Market Risk Delegated Act
ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) have responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the draft legal text of the upcoming market risk delegated act. The associations welcome the ongoing efforts to address the implementation...
ISDA/ASIFMA/GFXD Letter to RBI on INR-Denominated FX Derivatives Reporting
On March 9, 2026, ISDA, ASIFMA, and GFXD submitted a joint letter to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in response to the RBI’s Reporting Instructions for Authorised Dealer (AD) Category – I Banks draft directions to mandate the reporting...
IRD Trading Activity FY 2025 and Q4 2025
This report analyzes interest rate derivatives (IRD) trading activity reported in Europe. The analysis is based on transactions publicly reported by 30 European approved publication arrangements (APAs) and trading venues (TVs). Key highlights for the full year 2025 include: European...