This paper examines some factors that central counterparties (CCPs) should consider in structuring partial tear-up methodologies so as not to contravene rules on offsetting under the applicable accounting standards, which would render cleared derivatives uneconomical. The paper notes that CCPs can structure partial tear-up in a number of ways. Whatever the structure, the CCP’s methodology for partial tear-up should be transparent, written in its rule book, available to all potentially affected parties and should respect US GAAP and IFRS accounting standards.
Documents (1) for Consideration of Accounting Analysis for CCP Recovery and Continuity Tools
Latest
ISDA Launches Pre-adherence Period for Notices Hub
ISDA has begun a pre-adherence process for the ISDA Notices Hub, enabling firms to sign up to a free protocol that will allow them to use the new platform when it launches on July 15. Under the ISDA Master Agreement,...
ISDA SIMM EU Regulatory Approval Requirements
ISDA published ISDA SIMM version 2.7+2412 on May 22 – the first recalibration under the new semiannual cycle. The release triggered a new requirement for EU counterparties to apply for regulatory authorization to use the model – a submission that...
Creating Value - IQ June 2025
Ever since its establishment 40 years ago, ISDA has worked to enhance the safety and efficiency of derivatives markets. That has motivated everything we do – from the development of standard documentation and the rollout of new digital solutions to...
Paper on EC’s Sustainability Omnibus Proposal
On June 9, ISDA published a position paper setting out its views on the European Commission’s (EC) Sustainability Omnibus Package. In the paper, ISDA urges European authorities to: Ensure a proportionate, harmonized and symmetrical approach to the use of derivatives...