This paper examines some factors that central counterparties (CCPs) should consider in structuring partial tear-up methodologies so as not to contravene rules on offsetting under the applicable accounting standards, which would render cleared derivatives uneconomical. The paper notes that CCPs can structure partial tear-up in a number of ways. Whatever the structure, the CCP’s methodology for partial tear-up should be transparent, written in its rule book, available to all potentially affected parties and should respect US GAAP and IFRS accounting standards.
Documents (1) for Consideration of Accounting Analysis for CCP Recovery and Continuity Tools
Latest
CDM: User Journey from Concept to Production
The Common Domain Model (CDM) is a standardized, machine-readable and executable model for representing financial products, lifecycle events and contractual information. By providing an open source shared language across firms and platforms, it supports interoperability, automation, resource optimization and reduced...
ISDA DTF Tokyo SOM Opening Remarks
ISDA Derivatives Trading Forum Tokyo, October 23, 2026 Opening Remarks Scott O’Malia ISDA Chief Executive Good afternoon, and welcome to the ISDA Tokyo Derivatives Trading Forum. Thanks for joining us today, and a big thank you to our sponsors,...
Transforming Asset Management: SOM Remarks
Transforming Asset Management October 23, 2026 Welcoming Remarks Scott O’Malia, ISDA CEO Good morning, and welcome to ISDA’s Transforming Asset Management event. It’s great to be back in Tokyo for Japan Weeks. Now in its fourth year, Japan Weeks...
Response on Dividend Stripping
On October 14, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) and the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) submitted a joint response to the Dutch Ministry of Finance on its proposed measures on dividend stripping. While supporting the policy...