This paper examines some factors that central counterparties (CCPs) should consider in structuring partial tear-up methodologies so as not to contravene rules on offsetting under the applicable accounting standards, which would render cleared derivatives uneconomical. The paper notes that CCPs can structure partial tear-up in a number of ways. Whatever the structure, the CCP’s methodology for partial tear-up should be transparent, written in its rule book, available to all potentially affected parties and should respect US GAAP and IFRS accounting standards.
Documents (1) for Consideration of Accounting Analysis for CCP Recovery and Continuity Tools
Latest
Moving Regulatory Reporting up a Gear with AI
The aim of derivatives regulatory reporting is to improve transparency so regulators can monitor market activity and identify emerging risks. Although reporting rules and subsequent updates have resulted in improvements, they haven’t achieved fully consistent outcomes, leading to implementation and...
Sydney DTF: Scott O'Malia Opening Remarks
ISDA/AFMA Sydney Derivatives Trading Forum October 26, 2026 Opening Remarks Scott O’Malia ISDA Chief Executive Good morning, and welcome to the ISDA and AFMA Derivatives Trading Forum. Thanks for joining us today, and a big thank you to our...
ISDA Publishes FpML Version 5.14
ISDA has published a new version of its Financial products Markup Language (FpML), a widely used open-source standard for the electronic dealing and processing of derivatives transactions. The latest iteration – version 5.14 – incorporates several key modifications and updates...
Accounting for Tokenized Assets as Collateral
The use of tokenized assets as collateral for derivatives and securities financing transactions (SFTs) is emerging as a significant development in global capital markets. Financial institutions are increasingly evaluating tokenized representations of money market funds, government securities and other high-quality...