Consideration of Accounting Analysis for CCP Recovery and Continuity Tools

This paper examines some factors that central counterparties (CCPs) should consider in structuring partial tear-up methodologies so as not to contravene rules on offsetting under the applicable accounting standards, which would render cleared derivatives uneconomical. The paper notes that CCPs can structure partial tear-up in a number of ways. Whatever the structure, the CCP’s methodology for partial tear-up should be transparent, written in its rule book, available to all potentially affected parties and should respect US GAAP and IFRS accounting standards.

Documents (1) for Consideration of Accounting Analysis for CCP Recovery and Continuity Tools

Letter on EU Legislative Reform

On July 1, ISDA and 11 other trade associations published a statement on enhancing the EU legislative and supervisory framework to support market competitiveness. The statement highlights a significant opportunity to strengthen the EU’s regulatory and supervisory framework through the...

Response to CPMI-IOSCO Margin Proposals

On June 29, ISDA submitted a response to a consultation from the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) on updated guidance and public quantitative disclosures to implement the 2025 margin proposals....

US Treasury Repo Clearing Indicators May 2026

The ISDA-Actrix US Treasury Repo Market Clearing Indicators illustrate central clearing adoption in the US Treasury repo market. Sponsored cleared repo volumes are used as a proxy to monitor client participation in central clearing, the key objective of the Securities...