ISDA, GFMA and IIF ran a project to analyse the data submitted by 28 banks as part of the fourth Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) quantitative impact study (QIS). The results show banks using the standardised approach will have to hold 4.2 times the total market risk capital banks hold today.
Documents (1) for ISDA/GFMA/IIF publish industry FRTB QIS analysis
Latest
SwapsInfo H1 2025 and Q2 2025
Interest rate derivatives (IRD) trading activity increased in the first half of 2025, driven by continued interest rate volatility, evolving central bank policy expectations and persistent macroeconomic uncertainty. Trading in index credit derivatives also rose, as market participants responded to...
ISDA Response to IFSCA Consultation
On August 5, ISDA responded to the International Financial Services Centres Authority’s (IFSCA) consultation on reporting and clearing of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts booked in International Financial Services Centres (IFSC). In the response, ISDA provided the following recommendations: Not mandating...
ISDA Response to BIS on Tokenization
On July 30, ISDA submitted a response to a Bank for International Settlements (BIS) consultation on leveraging tokenization for payments and financial transactions. In the response, ISDA focused on the legal, regulatory and documentation issues relevant to the derivatives market,...
ISDA In Review – July 2025
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in July 2025.