ISDA, GFMA and IIF ran a project to analyse the data submitted by 28 banks as part of the fourth Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) quantitative impact study (QIS). The results show banks using the standardised approach will have to hold 4.2 times the total market risk capital banks hold today.
Documents (1) for ISDA/GFMA/IIF publish industry FRTB QIS analysis
Latest
Response to BoE on Systemic Stablecoins
On February 10, ISDA responded to the Bank of England’s (BoE) consultation on a proposed regulatory regime for sterling-denominated systemic stablecoins. In the response, ISDA highlights that any regulatory framework should be assessed through the lens of prudent risk management...
SwapsInfo Full Year 2025 and Q4 2025
Trading activity in interest rate derivatives (IRD) and credit derivatives increased in 2025, reflecting shifting monetary policy expectations and broader market conditions. IRD traded notional rose by about 46% year-on-year, led by an increase in overnight index swaps (OIS). Index...
ISDA ALF: Katherine Tew Darras Opening Remarks
ISDA Annual Legal Forum London, February 11, 2026 Opening Remarks Katherine Tew Darras ISDA General Counsel Good morning and welcome to ISDA’s Annual Legal Forum. Thank you for joining us today and thanks to our platinum sponsors – Cleary...
Maintaining Focus on Basel III Endgame Recalibration
In its original form, the US Basel III endgame proposal would have resulted in disproportionate increases in capital for trading book activities, forcing banks to make difficult choices about their participation in certain businesses. After two-and-a-half years, a revised proposal...