ISDA, GFMA and IIF ran a project to analyse the data submitted by 28 banks as part of the fourth Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) quantitative impact study (QIS). The results show banks using the standardised approach will have to hold 4.2 times the total market risk capital banks hold today.
Documents (1) for ISDA/GFMA/IIF publish industry FRTB QIS analysis
Latest
Response to EC Consultation on Carbon Price
On June 10, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the calculation of the carbon price paid in a third country under Article 9 of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). ISDA supports the EC’s proposal that evidence...
Response to CFTC on Clearing Requirements
On June 11, ISDA responded to the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s notice of proposed rulemaking on the clearing requirement determination under Section 2(h) of the Commodity Exchange Act for interest rate swaps to account for Canadian dollar-denominated and Mexican...
Digital Assets and Derivatives: Where Next?
Digital assets are moving into a phase of institutional integration into derivatives markets. Trading venues, custodial infrastructures and tokenization platforms now exist across both traditional financial markets and public blockchain networks. While this diversity has accelerated innovation and liquidity formation,...
ISDA Publishes ISDA SIMM® Methodology, Version 2.8+2512
Following the 2026 primary calibration exercise, ISDA is pleased to publish SIMM® version 2.8+2512. This version of the ISDA SIMM has updates that are based on the full recalibration of the model using historical data up to 31 December 2025....