On February 4, ISDA’s Accounting Committee responded to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Interpretations Committee on a fact pattern related to notional cash pooling facilities and the application of the offsetting rules. We do not believe that ‘intention’ as required by IAS 32 implies a certainty in period end balances, but instead an expectation in the net exchange of settlement amounts arising from an asset and liability on a specified date. We believe the tentative agenda decision should be amended to highlight the principles of IAS 32 and should not set out an opinion for this specific fact pattern.
Documents (1) for ISDA response to tentative agenda decision on IAS 32 Financial Instruments
Latest
Response to EC Call for Evidence on Tax Omnibus
On March 30, ISDA, the International Securities Lending Association and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe responded to the European Commission’s (EC) call for evidence on the tax omnibus. The associations argue that inconsistent interpretation of “beneficial ownership” among...
Managing Risk for Australian Superannuation Funds
Assets managed by the Australian superannuation sector reached A$4.5 trillion in December 2025, equivalent to around 160% of Australia’s GDP. Given its size, the sector has rapidly expanded its global footprint, with the share of offshore investments growing as a...
Updated OTC Derivatives Compliance Calendar
ISDA has updated its global calendar of compliance deadlines and regulatory dates for the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives space.
Next Steps on a Much Improved Basel III Endgame
Publication of the revised Basel III endgame proposal earlier this month marks an important step towards completion of the global capital reforms, giving banks much-needed clarity on the likely calibration of the rules in the US. The new proposal is...