On March 11, 2016, ISDA responded jointly with the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) to the European Banking Authority (EBA) consultation on assessment methodology on the use of internal models for market risk. The ISDA/AFME response notes the number of areas in the draft regulatory technical standards where the EBA sets out overly prescriptive criteria, highlights the need for sufficient supervisory discretion to reflect the diversity of EU regulated banks, and suggests the avoidance of any contradiction with the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book framework, which banks may need to implement already in 2019.
Documents (1) for ISDA/AFME respond to EBA consultation on internal models for market risk
Latest
Response on Proposed Changes to Transaction Rules
On May 22, ISDA and the Global Foreign Exchange Division (GFXD) of the Global Financial Markets Association submitted a joint response to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) consultation on proposed changes to the ASIC Derivative Transaction Rules (Reporting)...
EBA FRTB-ASA Benchmarking Support for Newly In-scope Banks
A new regulatory requirement is expected to bring additional EU banks into scope for submitting Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) Alternative Standardized Approach (ASA) capital as part of the European Banking Authority’s (EBA) benchmarking exercise. ISDA Capital Models...
Joint Letter on Sunset of Swaps TR Rules
On May 20, ISDA, FIA and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) submitted a joint letter to US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to request the CFTC to sunset large trader reporting rules (LTR) rules for physical commodity...
ISDA, SIFMA Letter on SEC-CFTC Harmonization
On May 19, ISDA and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) submitted a joint letter to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on SEC and CFTC harmonization, as part...