On June 10, ISDA, along with the Institute of International Finance (IIF) and the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA), responded to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision consultation on the second phase of the revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements. Although the industry strongly endorses the better understanding of banks’ capital and risk profiles, the response highlights concern about the quantity, highly technical character, and granularity of information required, which seem likely to contribute to information overload.
Documents (1) for Industry comments on the second phase of revised Pillar 3 consultation
Latest
Response to EC Consultation on MICA Review
On September 29, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) targeted consultation on the review of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MICA). ISDA’s response focuses on tokenization in over-the-counter derivatives and collateral markets. It argues that tokenized collateral can enable...
ISDA DTF Hong Kong: Steven Kennedy Remarks
ISDA Derivatives Trading Forum Hong Kong November 12, 2026 Opening Remarks Steven Kennedy Global Head of Public Policy, ISDA Good morning, and welcome to the ISDA Derivatives Trading Forum. It’s great to be here in Hong Kong – thanks for...
2026 FX Definitions: Act Now
On November 22, 2027, the 2026 FX Definitions will come into effect. From that point, these definitions will become the market standard for all cleared and new non-cleared FX derivatives, and the Swift messaging service will halt its support of...
IRD Trading in Mainland China and Hong Kong
This report examines interest rate derivatives (IRD) trading activity in mainland China and Hong Kong in the first half of 2026. Onshore renminbi (RMB) IRD traded notional in mainland China rose to $3.4 trillion in the first half of 2026,...