On June 10, ISDA, along with the Institute of International Finance (IIF) and the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA), responded to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision consultation on the second phase of the revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements. Although the industry strongly endorses the better understanding of banks’ capital and risk profiles, the response highlights concern about the quantity, highly technical character, and granularity of information required, which seem likely to contribute to information overload.
Documents (1) for Industry comments on the second phase of revised Pillar 3 consultation
Latest
S&P Global Selected as DC Administrator
ISDA and the Credit Derivatives Governance Committee have announced that S&P Global Market Intelligence has been selected as the administrator for the Credit Derivatives Determinations Committees (DCs). The announcement follows an invitation to tender in November 2025. The DC administrator...
Supporting ISDA SIMM Adoption in Australia
Derivatives have become a critical tool for Australia’s massive superannuation sector, as funds look to manage the risks associated with their expanding offshore investments. The use of derivatives brings real risk management benefits, but it also means funds need to...
ISDA, GDF Respond to the Central Bank of Ireland on DLT and Tokenization
On June 3, ISDA and Global Digital Finance responded to the Central Bank of Ireland’s discussion paper on distributed ledger technology (DLT) and tokenization in financial services. The response focuses on the potential role of DLT and tokenization within wholesale...
Response to Consultation on Dividend Stripping
On May 28, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the Dutch Ministry of Finance’s consultation on additional anti-dividend stripping measures, urging that the proposed rules should target only abusive arrangements and not ordinary, commercially...