Acronyms are not unusual in financial markets, but the list is about to get a lot bigger. OTFs, SIs, TOTV, LIS and SSTI – these are just a selection of the terms that are about to elbow their way into Europe’s financial vernacular as the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MIFID II) comes into force.
Scheduled for implementation from next year, MIFID II and its accompanying regulation, MIFIR, will introduce new trading venues, a trading obligation, a new transparency regime and strict reporting requirements, among other things. It is vast in scale, and it’s very, very complicated. So much so that it’s difficult to find many practitioners who are truly confident its implementation will be completely smooth and without incident.
That’s partly due to a lack of clarity in key areas. For example, market participants point to a critical need for equivalence decisions to avoid crippling liquidity fragmentation. There has been some recent progress between the European Commission (EC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, but trading venue equivalence needs to be in place before the end of the year to ensure cross-border trading is not affected after the start date of MIFID II.
Outside of MIFID II, there’s plenty going on to keep firms busy. Along with the start of the EU Benchmarks Regulation from January 1, European regulators are reviewing the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), with the objective of reducing complexity and unnecessary costs. The EC is also reviewing rules for the supervision of third-country central counterparties (CCPs) – and, as part of that, has proposed a location policy for those CCPs that pose significant systemic importance to the EU.
In this issue of IQ, we take a quick tour of some of the issues keeping European policy-makers busy. The first article looks at MIFID II, and highlights some of the remaining areas of uncertainty. We then turn to the review of EMIR, and highlight the requirements that would benefit from reform. We round off the package with an article on CCP supervision, and present ISDA’s analysis on the impact of a possible location policy for third-country CCPs.
Click on attached PDF to read the full issue.
Documents (1) for Leap to MIFID II – Vol 3, Issue 3: November 2017
Latest
The CPI Quandary
The recent US government shutdown didn’t just create weeks of political drama – it also left inflation-linked swaps dealers with a major headache: how should they determine an initial value for new trades given the US Bureau of Labor Statistics...
ISDA Response to HMT, BoE on UK CCPs
On November 18, ISDA submitted its responses to the Bank of England (BoE) consultation on ensuring the resilience of central counterparties (CCPs) and the UK Treasury’s (HMT) two draft CCP statutory instruments (SIs). These consultations form part of the update...
Doubling Down on Appropriate Trading Book Capital
Throughout ISDA’s 40th anniversary year, we’ve been reflecting on the quest for greater consistency and efficiency that underpins everything we’ve achieved since 1985. It was at the heart of the original efforts to bring greater standardization to the nascent derivatives...
Determining Initial Reference Index for New Trades
On November 25, 2025, ISDA published a Market Practice Note (MPN) to recommend a specific methodology that market participants could elect to use for the purposes of determining the Initial Reference Index for certain new inflation derivative transactions given that...