Acronyms are not unusual in financial markets, but the list is about to get a lot bigger. OTFs, SIs, TOTV, LIS and SSTI – these are just a selection of the terms that are about to elbow their way into Europe’s financial vernacular as the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MIFID II) comes into force.
Scheduled for implementation from next year, MIFID II and its accompanying regulation, MIFIR, will introduce new trading venues, a trading obligation, a new transparency regime and strict reporting requirements, among other things. It is vast in scale, and it’s very, very complicated. So much so that it’s difficult to find many practitioners who are truly confident its implementation will be completely smooth and without incident.
That’s partly due to a lack of clarity in key areas. For example, market participants point to a critical need for equivalence decisions to avoid crippling liquidity fragmentation. There has been some recent progress between the European Commission (EC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, but trading venue equivalence needs to be in place before the end of the year to ensure cross-border trading is not affected after the start date of MIFID II.
Outside of MIFID II, there’s plenty going on to keep firms busy. Along with the start of the EU Benchmarks Regulation from January 1, European regulators are reviewing the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), with the objective of reducing complexity and unnecessary costs. The EC is also reviewing rules for the supervision of third-country central counterparties (CCPs) – and, as part of that, has proposed a location policy for those CCPs that pose significant systemic importance to the EU.
In this issue of IQ, we take a quick tour of some of the issues keeping European policy-makers busy. The first article looks at MIFID II, and highlights some of the remaining areas of uncertainty. We then turn to the review of EMIR, and highlight the requirements that would benefit from reform. We round off the package with an article on CCP supervision, and present ISDA’s analysis on the impact of a possible location policy for third-country CCPs.
Click on attached PDF to read the full issue.
Documents (1) for Leap to MIFID II – Vol 3, Issue 3: November 2017
Latest
India Forum Scott O'Malia Opening Remarks
India Derivatives Markets Forum April 16, 2026 Opening Remarks Scott O’Malia, ISDA Chief Executive Good morning and welcome. This is the third year we’ve run the India Derivatives Markets Forum, and the number of people attending has grown each...
Global Trading in INR Derivatives
Global trading in derivatives involving the Indian rupee (INR) has expanded significantly over the past decade, reflecting the currency’s growing role in international hedging and trading activity. According to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Triennial Central Bank Survey, the...
Response to FCA on Commodity Derivatives Clearing
On April 9, ISDA, the Commodity Markets Council Europe (CMCE), Energy Traders Europe (ETE) and FIA jointly responded to Chapter 7 of the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Quarterly Consultation CP26/8 on increasing the clearing threshold for commodity derivatives under the UK...
Response on EC’s SFR Proposal
On April 9, ISDA published technical comments on the European Commission’s (EC) proposed Settlement Finality Regulation (SFR) as it applies to designated EU systems and registered third-country systems. One significant concern is that the scope of insolvency protections provided to...