Post-trade risk reduction has become increasingly common as a means to reduce risks in the derivatives market. Portfolio compression is a case in point: offsetting trades between multiple parties are torn up, which reduces the size of gross exposures, in turn reducing systemic risk. Over €1,000 trillion in derivatives exposures has been eliminated in this manner.
Regulators recognize the value of compression. Under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), market participants with more than 500 over-the-counter (OTC) trades on their books are required to examine the possibility of performing portfolio compression twice a year.
However, EMIR simultaneously disincentivizes use of this service by requiring administrative trades that result from compression, and which fall under the clearing mandate, to be cleared. This limits the ability of participants to perform compression and reduce risk.
The same is true of other post-trade risk reduction services like counterparty rebalancing. This involves inserting new, market-risk neutral transactions into netting sets to reduce risk exposures between counterparties. This decreases counterparty credit risk and therefore reduces systemic risk. However, those new transactions are required to be cleared if they are subject to the clearing obligation, preventing counterparty rebalancing risk reduction from taking place. As a result, counterparty rebalancing today is only limited to FX derivatives, which are not subject to the clearing obligation. Over €100 billion in counterparty credit risk has been reduced in this manner.
ISDA, the EBF, ICMA and ISLA believe EMIR should be amended as part of the Regulatory Fitness and Performance program (REFIT) to allow non-price forming, market-risk neutral transactions that result from post-trade risk reduction services to be exempted from the clearing obligation.
To read the full whitepaper, click on the link below.
Documents (1) for Incentivizing Post-trade Risk Reduction
Latest
Response on Scope of BMR
On July 28, ISDA and the Global Foreign Exchange Division of the Global Financial Markets Association responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the need to exempt spot foreign exchange (FX) benchmarks under Article 18a of the EU Benchmarks...
Strengthening DC Governance
The Credit Derivatives Determinations Committees (DCs) play a vital role. Without a single, industry-wide determination on whether a credit event has occurred, it simply wouldn’t be possible to clear credit default swaps (CDS), making the market less safe and less...
ISDA CSA Significant Errors Notification SOP
The ISDA CSA Notification of Significant Error or Omissions Suggested Operational Practices (SOP) considers current institutional processes and outlines suggested operational practices related to the new requirement under §26.3(2) of the Canadian Trade Repositories and Derivatives Data Reporting rules rewrite...
ISDA Paper on UPI Identifiers
On July 16, ISDA submitted a paper (UPI as the Foundation for OTC Derivatives Reporting: The Case for UPI) to the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The paper was developed to complement ISDA’s response to the FCA’s discussion paper DP24/2:...