Notional amount outstanding is a widely used metric in the derivatives market, but it is more a measure of traded volume or transaction size and less a measure of risk. A recent research paper published by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) highlights this point, and introduces an alternate metric for the interest rate derivatives market.
However, many derivatives regulations employ notional amount as a trigger or threshold to determine whether and how certain requirements will apply. This paper highlights a number of areas where derivatives rules are based on notional amount and similar measures. In so doing, the intention is to contribute to the important policy discussion about the merits of a risk-based regulatory framework.
Documents (1) for Uses of Notional Amount in Derivatives Regulation
Latest
ISDA Response to FCA on Fund Tokenization
On November 21, ISDA responded to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) consultation paper CP25/28 on progressing fund tokenization. In the response, ISDA focuses on the use of tokenized assets as both cleared and non-cleared derivatives collateral. Tokenization presents a significant...
ISDA Requests FASB to Consider ASC 815
On November 19, ISDA submitted a request to the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to clarify whether FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815 does not prohibit using the spot method to assess hedge...
ISDA Response to CFTC Tokenized Collateral and Stablecoin Initiative
ISDA has responded to the CFTC’s Request for Input on the Tokenized Collateral and Stablecoin Initiative, offering perspectives on how tokenization and GENIUS Act–compliant payment stablecoins might contribute to more efficient and resilient collateral practices in derivatives markets. The letter...
Protected: 2025 Year-End Bonus Election Form
This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: Password: