Executive Summary
- The leverage ratio is a poor indicator of bank condition.
- The Proposal would not meaningfully reduce the aggregate level of Tier 1 capital required to be held by U.S. GSIBs, nor would it undermine in any way the overall resilience of the banking sector or the financial system as a whole.
- The proposed modifications to the eSLR requirements would better align those requirements with their appropriate role as a backstop to risk-based capital requirements and reduce disparities between the U.S. capital framework and international standards. Additional modifications would further improve the role of the eSLR within the U.S. capital framework.
- The Proposal’s use of the Federal Reserve’s GSIB surcharge rule to determine eSLR requirements increases the importance of a comprehensive reassessment and recalibration of the U.S. GSIB surcharge.
- The eSLR requirement for subsidiary IDIs of U.S. GSIBs should be implemented as a buffer requirement instead of a requirement for well-capitalized status under the prompt corrective action (“PCA”) framework.
- The Agencies should make changes to the denominators for leverage capital requirements to further improve the regulatory capital framework.
- The Federal Reserve should make further changes to the TLAC SLR and LTD SLR requirements applicable to U.S. GSIBs in addition to modifying these requirements to reflect the recalibration of the eSLR.
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR requirement for U.S. GSIBs from 4.5% of total leverage exposure to 2.5% of total leverage exposure, without incorporating half of a firm’s GSIB surcharge in the minimum requirement or requiring it as a buffer; and
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR and LTD Tier 1 leverage ratio requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs to 1.875% and 2.625%, respectively, to reflect the appropriate scaling of internal TLAC requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs.
- Recalibrating the TLAC SLR buffer from a uniform 2% amount to half of a firm’s GSIB surcharge would appropriately reflect the proposed modifications to the eSLR buffer.
- The Federal Reserve should recalibrate the minimum TLAC SLR requirement from 7.5% to 5.5% to reflect the capital refill framework, or, at a minimum, recalibrate the minimum requirement from 7.5% to 6.75% to eliminate U.S. gold-plating relative to international standards.
- Any changes to the calibration of the minimum TLAC SLR requirement for U.S. GSIBs should result in corresponding changes to the minimum TLAC SLR requirement for covered IHCs to reflect the appropriate scaling of internal TLAC requirements for covered IHCs.
- The Federal Reserve should eliminate the separate LTD requirements applicable to U.S. GSIBs and covered IHCs from the TLAC rule, or at least eliminate the LTD SLR requirement. If the Federal Reserve retains the LTD SLR requirement, it should:
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR requirement for U.S. GSIBs from 4.5% of total leverage exposure to 2.5% of total leverage exposure, without incorporating half of a firm’s GSIB surcharge in the minimum requirement or requiring it as a buffer; and
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR and LTD Tier 1 leverage ratio requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs to 1.875% and 2.625%, respectively, to reflect the appropriate scaling of internal TLAC requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs.
- The Proposal’s clarification of the formulas used to calculate a firm’s TLAC buffer amount(s) would improve the TLAC rule.
Documents (1) for Joint Trades eSLR/TLAC Comment Letter
Latest
Expanding Legal Agreement Coverage in the CDM
This paper examines the recent extension of the Common Domain Model (CDM)1 to represent two of the most significant, and previously undeveloped, areas of its legal agreement model: umbrella agreements and contract amendments. Umbrella agreements are widely used to document...
ISDA Omnibus Canadian Representation Letter
On September 2, ISDA published the Omnibus Canadian Representation Letter, which combines previously published representation letters drafted to assist firms in compliance with Canadian trade reporting, business conduct, regulatory margin and clearing classification rules. The Omnibus Canadian Letter is designed...
Joint Response on Cross-margining
On August 31, ISDA and FIA submitted a letter to the US Commodity Futures and Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the agencies’ joint request for comment on the implementation of portfolio margining and cross-margining...
Accounting for Carbon Credits: Latest Developments
This paper updates and extends the analysis set out in ISDA’s October 2023 paper on accounting for carbon credits. While preserving the original focus on the accounting treatment of voluntary carbon credits (VCCs) and compliance carbon credits (CCCs), it expands...
