Executive Summary
- The leverage ratio is a poor indicator of bank condition.
- The Proposal would not meaningfully reduce the aggregate level of Tier 1 capital required to be held by U.S. GSIBs, nor would it undermine in any way the overall resilience of the banking sector or the financial system as a whole.
- The proposed modifications to the eSLR requirements would better align those requirements with their appropriate role as a backstop to risk-based capital requirements and reduce disparities between the U.S. capital framework and international standards. Additional modifications would further improve the role of the eSLR within the U.S. capital framework.
- The Proposal’s use of the Federal Reserve’s GSIB surcharge rule to determine eSLR requirements increases the importance of a comprehensive reassessment and recalibration of the U.S. GSIB surcharge.
- The eSLR requirement for subsidiary IDIs of U.S. GSIBs should be implemented as a buffer requirement instead of a requirement for well-capitalized status under the prompt corrective action (“PCA”) framework.
- The Agencies should make changes to the denominators for leverage capital requirements to further improve the regulatory capital framework.
- The Federal Reserve should make further changes to the TLAC SLR and LTD SLR requirements applicable to U.S. GSIBs in addition to modifying these requirements to reflect the recalibration of the eSLR.
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR requirement for U.S. GSIBs from 4.5% of total leverage exposure to 2.5% of total leverage exposure, without incorporating half of a firm’s GSIB surcharge in the minimum requirement or requiring it as a buffer; and
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR and LTD Tier 1 leverage ratio requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs to 1.875% and 2.625%, respectively, to reflect the appropriate scaling of internal TLAC requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs.
- Recalibrating the TLAC SLR buffer from a uniform 2% amount to half of a firm’s GSIB surcharge would appropriately reflect the proposed modifications to the eSLR buffer.
- The Federal Reserve should recalibrate the minimum TLAC SLR requirement from 7.5% to 5.5% to reflect the capital refill framework, or, at a minimum, recalibrate the minimum requirement from 7.5% to 6.75% to eliminate U.S. gold-plating relative to international standards.
- Any changes to the calibration of the minimum TLAC SLR requirement for U.S. GSIBs should result in corresponding changes to the minimum TLAC SLR requirement for covered IHCs to reflect the appropriate scaling of internal TLAC requirements for covered IHCs.
- The Federal Reserve should eliminate the separate LTD requirements applicable to U.S. GSIBs and covered IHCs from the TLAC rule, or at least eliminate the LTD SLR requirement. If the Federal Reserve retains the LTD SLR requirement, it should:
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR requirement for U.S. GSIBs from 4.5% of total leverage exposure to 2.5% of total leverage exposure, without incorporating half of a firm’s GSIB surcharge in the minimum requirement or requiring it as a buffer; and
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR and LTD Tier 1 leverage ratio requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs to 1.875% and 2.625%, respectively, to reflect the appropriate scaling of internal TLAC requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs.
- The Proposal’s clarification of the formulas used to calculate a firm’s TLAC buffer amount(s) would improve the TLAC rule.
Documents (1) for Joint Trades eSLR/TLAC Comment Letter
Latest
Response to MAS on Treatment of Crypto Assets
On May 15, ISDA and the Asia Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association submitted a joint response to the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) consultation, published in April 2026, on the prudential treatment of crypto assets on permissionless blockchains, welcoming MAS’s more...
Joint Response to EC on Market Risk Delegated Act
ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) have responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the draft legal text of the upcoming market risk delegated act. The associations welcome the ongoing efforts to address the implementation...
ISDA/ASIFMA/GFXD Letter to RBI on INR-Denominated FX Derivatives Reporting
On March 9, 2026, ISDA, ASIFMA, and GFXD submitted a joint letter to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in response to the RBI’s Reporting Instructions for Authorised Dealer (AD) Category – I Banks draft directions to mandate the reporting...
IRD Trading Activity FY 2025 and Q4 2025
This report analyzes interest rate derivatives (IRD) trading activity reported in Europe. The analysis is based on transactions publicly reported by 30 European approved publication arrangements (APAs) and trading venues (TVs). Key highlights for the full year 2025 include: European...
