Jurisdictions across the globe have implemented margin requirements for non-cleared derivatives, largely in line with the standards agreed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO). Since implementation of the first phase of the requirements in 2016, the US, European Union (EU), Japan and others have extended the requirements in line with the phase-in schedule agreed by BCBS/IOSCO.
Consistency in requirements has enabled ISDA to develop and implement industry solutions to aid compliance, including standard initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) documentation, the ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (ISDA SIMMTM) and ISDA Create – IM, an online tool for negotiating and executing IM documents.
Nonetheless, differences in the implementation across jurisdictions still exist in certain key areas – for example, eligible collateral, settlement time frames and treatment of inter-affiliate transactions. These inconsistencies create unnecessary complexity and costs for derivatives users and contribute to market fragmentation.
This paper highlights the main areas of difference in the implementation of margin requirements for non-cleared derivatives across jurisdictions, and makes recommendations on how to resolve them.
Click on the attached PDF to read the paper.
Documents (1) for Implementation of Margin Requirements and Market Fragmentation
Latest
Refreshing the FX Definitions
A lot has changed in the FX derivatives market since 1998, when the last set of standard definitions for FX transactions were published. Trading volumes have grown substantially, and average daily turnover has risen by six times. Market practices have...
ISDA & EMTA Publish New FX Definitions
ISDA and EMTA, Inc., the trade association for emerging markets, have jointly published a revised set of standard definitions for foreign exchange (FX) derivatives transactions, which update key market practices and consolidate various FX and FX-related product templates and provisions...
ISDA Position Paper on SFDR Review
On February 27, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) published a position paper on the European Commission’s (EC) proposed revisions to the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR 2.0). The paper welcomes the EC’s proposal as a...
ISDA Response to HKMA SFC Consultation on Clearing Rules
On February 27, ISDA responded to a joint consultation by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) and the Securities Futures Commission (SFC) on proposed amendments to schedule 2 of the clearing rules for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. The proposed amendments introduce...