Private International Law Aspects of Smart Derivatives Contracts Utilizing DLT

This paper considers the private international law, or conflict-of-law, aspects of derivatives contracts governed by the laws of Singapore and England and Wales involving distributed ledger technology (DLT), commonly known as blockchain technology.

DLT systems are often borderless, allowing multiple users or participants to modify records in a shared database that may be based in several jurisdictions without necessarily needing to use a central validation system that imposes its own standards and processes.

This type of system may leave participants vulnerable to multiple – and potentially inconsistent – assertions of governing law. There may also be conflict-of-law issues regarding the situs (ie, where property is treated as being located for legal purposes) of any assets that are native to a DLT platform. Private international law rules relating to property typically dictate that questions over rights and entitlements to property are governed by the law of the place in which the property or claim to property is situated. However, this may be ineffective in a DLT environment as traditional geographic boundaries may be more difficult to establish in the context of financial transactions (and assets relating to those transactions) conducted on a DLT platform.

This paper will identify specific private international law issues with respect to contract law that may arise when trading derivatives in a DLT environment and, where appropriate, will propose recommendations on how these issues might be clarified or resolved.

Read the full paper by clicking on the attached PDF.

On January 29, ISDA hosted a panel discussion on this topic. You can view the discussion here.

Documents (1) for Private International Law Aspects of Smart Derivatives Contracts Utilizing DLT

Expanding the Universe of Eligible VM

ISDA conducted a series of interviews with buy- and sell-side firms to understand the drivers of a growing use of non-cash assets as variation margin (VM) for non-cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives and the barriers that remain to expanding the use...

ISDA Response on Hedge Accounting Guidance

On August 14, ISDA responded to an exposure draft from the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). ISDA broadly supports the FASB’s proposed targeted improvements to hedge accounting, including allowing interest rate hedging of held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities, recognizing all Secured...

Joint Response to EBA Consultation

On August 12, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the European Banking Authority’s discussion paper on certain taxonomy key performance indicators (KPIs) and other aspects of the Disclosures Delegated Act  under Article 8 of...

Response to JSCC on Clearing Fund Consolidation

On August 12, ISDA responded to the Japan Securities Clearing Corporation’s (JSCC) consultation on its proposal to consolidate clearing fund consumption, calculation and deposit segmentation across six clearing qualifications under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. ISDA members broadly support...