ISDA Chief Executive Officer Scott O'Malia offers informal comments on important OTC derivatives issues in derivatiViews, reflecting ISDA's long-held commitment to making the market safer and more efficient.
Throughout the coronavirus crisis, global regulators have moved quickly and decisively to provide important regulatory relief, recognizing that firms need to devote all available resources to ensuring business continuity, managing severe market volatility and supporting the real economy. An important announcement late last week – the delay of Basel III by a year – is a big help in achieving that.
The postponement of Basel III until January 2023 means banks have extra time to prepare for the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB), the revised credit valuation adjustment framework and the phase-in of the output floor, among other things. Each of these entail complex modelling implementation, data collection and testing, which needs to be done well in advance of the start date. With most bank staff working from home and focused on maintaining critical bank operations, bandwidth for other implementation initiatives is virtually non-existent.
It’s now over to national authorities to adopt these revised timetables – some, including the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, the Japanese Financial Services Agency and Canada’s Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, have already taken action. In Europe, regulators will also need to decide whether to delay reporting requirements under the FRTB standardized approach, currently scheduled for implementation in 2021. ISDA will track the implementation schedule at the national level, and will update the COVID-19 section of our website accordingly.
ISDA greatly appreciates the responsiveness and quick action of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and other national authorities. Providing certainty now will give important reassurance to firms on how to manage scarce resources.
However, we would urge regulators to go further and to provide similar certainty to those small entities due to come into scope of initial margin requirements in September 2020 and September 2021. According to ISDA analysis, an estimated 3,616 counterparty relationships will have to comply this year, followed by another 5,443 in 2021. With firms focused on their coronavirus response, there is no spare capacity to run the necessary average aggregate notional amount calculations, implement and test margin calculation systems, establish custodial relationships and negotiate new documentation.
Regulators have taken an important step in modifying the timetable for the capital framework. Without similar flexibility on margin, smaller derivatives users could find themselves unable to access the derivatives markets at a time of unprecedented volatility.
Coronavirus developments, including information on market closures, regulatory relief and electronic execution, can be found here. Please email Covid19.MemberContact@isda.org if you have any questions.
Latest
Episode 59: Reducing Burdens
As she nears the end of her term as chair of the European Securities and Markets Authority, Verena Ross joins The Swap to discuss progress in simplifying and reducing the burden of EU financial regulation, including transaction reporting. Please view...
CDS Market Dynamics: Record 2025
Global credit default swap (CDS) market activity reached a record $41.8 trillion in 2025, surpassing the previous peak of $38.7 trillion in 2022. Index CDS drove the increase, accounting for 93.3% of total activity and reaching a record $39.0 trillion....
ISDA Letter to CFTC on Public Interest Determinations for Event Contracts
On July 27, ISDA submitted a letter to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on the CFTC’s proposed rulemaking on public interest determinations for event contracts published in the Federal Register on June 12, 2026. ISDA emphasized the importance...
ISDA Letter to BCBS on RMA Models
On July 24, ISDA wrote to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) to request guidance on how the proposed Risk Mitigation Accounting (RMA) model under International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9/IFRS 7 should be treated for prudential regulatory capital...
