On 1 September ISDA responded to the ESA’s Joint Consultation Paper on ESG disclosures under SFDR. In summary, ISDA members would prefer to include a separate section on information on how the use of derivatives meets each of the environmental or social characteristics or sustainable investment objectives promoted by the financial product, under Articles 19 and 28 of the RTS. This relates to the role of derivatives as a risk-management tool, requiring that disclosures in relation to the ‘use of derivatives’ should be different than disclosures for other financial products such as equities and bonds as otherwise this could lead to confusion for investors. For example, derivatives may be used in an ESG fund to hedge against currency and interest rate risks, with the derivatives themselves not having a sustainable investment objective. Furthermore, ISDA endorses the views expressed by AIMA/MFA that the ESAs should consider whether the opt-in regime for principal adverse impacts (PAI) should be more nuanced and allow smaller financial market participants to opt-in based on subsets of the 32 indicators in considerations, rather than allowing only for a binary choice between no PAI considerations and the full disclosure of 32 indicators.
Documents (1) for ISDA Responds to European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) Joint Consultation Paper on ESG disclosures under SFDR
Latest
Recognition of Cross-product Netting is Critical
US regulators are in the process of making important changes to the regulatory capital framework by proposing modifications to the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio, which should help stop it from acting as a non-risk-sensitive constraint on bank capacity – a...
ISDA, GFXD Response to FCA on SI Regime
On September 10, ISDA and the Global Foreign Exchange Division (GFXD) of the Global Financial Markets Association responded to the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) consultation paper CP25/20 on the systematic internalizer (SI) regime for derivatives and bonds. ISDA and the...
ISDA, IIF Response to PRA on Market Risk Framework
On September 12, ISDA and the Institute of International Finance (IIF) submitted a joint response to the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA) consultation on adjustments to the market risk capital framework (CP 17/25). ISDA and the IIF strongly believe the market...
ISDA Response on Clearing Costs
On September 8, ISDA responded to consultation by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on a draft regulatory technical standard on clearing fees and associated costs (article 7c(4) of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR)). In the response, ISDA...