Both Brexit and benchmark reform emerged as headline issues relatively close together – June 2016 for the Brexit referendum and July 2017 when the UK Financial Conduct Authority revealed that LIBOR might not exist after the end of 2021. They are now also approaching their denouement in lockstep: both will require a big push by firms in the remaining months of 2020 in order to be ready for the changes they will bring in 2021 and beyond.
In this issue of IQ, we pick up on both of those topics. As part of our cover package focusing on Asia-Pacific, we explore the progress firms in the region have made on LIBOR transition, as well as efforts to build liquidity in alternatives to local interbank offered rates (IBORs). As big users of LIBOR, Asian institutions have large legacy exposures – and, as some regulators in the region are warning, prompt action is needed now to deal with them.
The rollout of new, robust fallbacks will help reduce the systemic disruption that would likely occur in the event an IBOR ceases to exist, and ISDA will shortly publish a supplement and protocol to incorporate fallbacks into derivatives contracts that reference key IBORs. According to a statement from the ISDA board of directors in July, the protocol will be the “most efficient way for participants in the vast majority of non-cleared derivatives markets to mitigate against the risks associated with the discontinuation of a key IBOR”.
When it comes to Brexit, one of the open questions relates to disputes on derivatives transactions where the parties have opted for their ISDA Master Agreement to be governed by English law and subject to the jurisdiction of English courts. Specifically, there is still some uncertainty over the recognition and enforcement of English court judgements in Europe after the end of the Brexit transition period on December 31, 2020.
In this issue, we look at this question from a variety of perspectives. As well as an analysis of possible scenarios for how European states will treat English court jurisdiction clauses and judgements post-transition, we also begin a series of articles exploring the options derivatives participants have for the resolution of disputes.
Whether ramping up LIBOR transition efforts, implementing new fallbacks or exploring the impact of different scenarios after the Brexit transition period, much of the hard work and preparation needs to occur now. To support members, ISDA will continue to publish information and analysis on its website (www.isda.org/fallbacks, www.isda.org/tag/brexit), and, where possible, develop industry solutions to ease implementation challenges.
Click on the attached PDF to read the full issue.
Documents (1) for Asian Options – IQ September 2020
Latest
Joint Response to 2026 US G-SIB Surcharge Proposal
On June 18, ISDA, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the Institute of International Finance submitted a joint response to US agencies on proposed changes to the surcharge for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs). The associations welcome the...
Eyeing the Basel III Finish Line
An effective regulatory capital framework relies on multiple ingredients, from appropriate drafting to rigorous testing and consultation. Even minor calibration distortions can inflate capital requirements, which could negatively affect the capacity of banks to support deep and liquid markets, with...
Joint Comment Letter on Basel III Endgame Proposal
The Institute of International Finance (IIF), the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) today submitted a joint comment letter to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the...
Joint Response to 2026 US Basel III Proposal
On June 18, ISDA, the Institute of International Finance and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association submitted a joint response to the 2026 US Basel III notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR). The response focuses on the Fundamental Review of...
