On October 22, 2020, ISDA submitted a response to a consultation by the European Banking Authority (EBA) on the requirements of the internal default risk model to estimate default probabilities and losses given default.
Institutions using an alternative internal model to compute own funds requirements for market risk and holding positions in traded debt and equity instruments through trading desks covered by internal models approach permission are required to additionally compute an own funds requirement using an internal default risk model.
One of the requirements under the internal default risk model is for institutions to be capable of modelling the default of individual issuers, as well as the simultaneous default of multiple issuers, and computing the impact of those defaults on the market values of the positions that are included in the scope of that model. This consultation specifies the requirements that an institution’s internal methodology or external sources are to fulfil for estimating default probabilities and losses given default.
The industry appreciates the EBA’s efforts in developing regulatory standards for the sources used to develop default probabilities and losses given default. However, there are concerns about using the internal rating-based approach, which was built and designed for banking book activities. Utilizing this approach for market risk could lead to model design inconsistencies.
Documents (1) for Consultation Response on Internal Default Risk Model Requirements
Latest
ISDA In Review – August 2026
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in August 2026.
Remove Bureaucracy from Cross-margin Approvals
Cross-margining programs play a critical role in financial markets. By ensuring margin requirements more closely reflect the actual risk of a portfolio of products, they reduce liquidity strain and improve market efficiency, both of which will become even more important...
Joint Response on CCP Resolution
On September 7, ISDA and FIA responded to a Bank of England (BOE) discussion paper on central counterparty (CCP) resolution. The associations support greater clarity on valuation capabilities prior to a crisis scenario and the boundary between recovery and resolution,...
Expanding Legal Agreement Coverage in the CDM
This paper examines the recent extension of the Common Domain Model (CDM) to represent two of the most significant, and previously undeveloped, areas of its legal agreement model: umbrella agreements and contract amendments. Umbrella agreements are widely used to document...
