On October 22, 2020, ISDA submitted a response to a consultation by the European Banking Authority (EBA) on the requirements of the internal default risk model to estimate default probabilities and losses given default.
Institutions using an alternative internal model to compute own funds requirements for market risk and holding positions in traded debt and equity instruments through trading desks covered by internal models approach permission are required to additionally compute an own funds requirement using an internal default risk model.
One of the requirements under the internal default risk model is for institutions to be capable of modelling the default of individual issuers, as well as the simultaneous default of multiple issuers, and computing the impact of those defaults on the market values of the positions that are included in the scope of that model. This consultation specifies the requirements that an institution’s internal methodology or external sources are to fulfil for estimating default probabilities and losses given default.
The industry appreciates the EBA’s efforts in developing regulatory standards for the sources used to develop default probabilities and losses given default. However, there are concerns about using the internal rating-based approach, which was built and designed for banking book activities. Utilizing this approach for market risk could lead to model design inconsistencies.
Documents (1) for Consultation Response on Internal Default Risk Model Requirements
Latest
Determining Initial Reference Index for New Trades
On November 25, 2025, ISDA published a Market Practice Note (MPN) to recommend a specific methodology that market participants could elect to use for the purposes of determining the Initial Reference Index for certain new inflation derivative transactions given that...
ISDA Response to FCA on Fund Tokenization
On November 21, ISDA responded to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) consultation paper CP25/28 on progressing fund tokenization. In the response, ISDA focuses on the use of tokenized assets as both cleared and non-cleared derivatives collateral. Tokenization presents a significant...
ISDA Requests FASB to Consider ASC 815
On November 19, ISDA submitted a request to the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to clarify whether FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815 does not prohibit using the spot method to assess hedge...
ISDA Response to CFTC Tokenized Collateral and Stablecoin Initiative
ISDA has responded to the CFTC’s Request for Input on the Tokenized Collateral and Stablecoin Initiative, offering perspectives on how tokenization and GENIUS Act–compliant payment stablecoins might contribute to more efficient and resilient collateral practices in derivatives markets. The letter...