COVID-19 and CCP Risk Management Frameworks

After the market turmoil caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in March and April 2020, the ISDA Clearing Member Committee analyzed how central counterparty (CCP) risk management frameworks reacted to the crisis, based on feedback from CCPs.

The results show CCPs dealt with the crisis well, managing record volumes while most of their staff worked from home. In total, there were three member defaults or close-outs, none of which threatened financial stability. This reflects a more stable financial system overall: clearing members are much better capitalized and hold more liquidity compared to the last crisis.

However, some issues did emerge. Procyclical initial margin requirements exacerbated market stress at certain points. Clearing members also lacked timely information about backtesting breaches and procyclicality in margin models. The paper makes recommendations to address both of those points.

ISDA AGM Studio: José Manuel Campa, EBA

José Manuel Campa, chairperson of the European Banking Authority, speaks to Mark Gheerbrant, ISDA’s global head of risk and capital, about concerns over differences in timing and content of the Basel III reforms across jurisdictions and what can be done...

ISDA AGM Studio: Doug Donahue and Oliver Maxwell

Just a small delay in the delivery and receipt of a termination notice can have significant economic consequences for derivatives counterparties. Doug Donahue, partner at Linklaters, and Oliver Maxwell, product management director, platforms and regulatory compliance at S&P Global Market...