COVID-19 and CCP Risk Management Frameworks

After the market turmoil caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in March and April 2020, the ISDA Clearing Member Committee analyzed how central counterparty (CCP) risk management frameworks reacted to the crisis, based on feedback from CCPs.

The results show CCPs dealt with the crisis well, managing record volumes while most of their staff worked from home. In total, there were three member defaults or close-outs, none of which threatened financial stability. This reflects a more stable financial system overall: clearing members are much better capitalized and hold more liquidity compared to the last crisis.

However, some issues did emerge. Procyclical initial margin requirements exacerbated market stress at certain points. Clearing members also lacked timely information about backtesting breaches and procyclicality in margin models. The paper makes recommendations to address both of those points.

ISDA AGM Studio: David Bailey

David Bailey, executive director, prudential policy, at the Bank of England, speaks with ISDA CEO Scott O’Malia about the UK’s approach to Basel 3.1, the impact of the revised US Basel III endgame on cross‑border consistency and the role of the...

ISDA AGM Studio: Scott O'Malia and Chris Edmonds

Christopher Edmonds, president, fixed income & data services, at Intercontinental Exchange, speaks with Scott O’Malia, ISDA CEO, about how market volatility, regulatory change and technological transformation are reshaping global markets. The discussion explores what recent volatility has meant for participation,...

ISDA AGM Studio: Bill Borden, Microsoft

Bill Borden, corporate vice president, worldwide financial services, at Microsoft, speaks with Mark New, ISDA’s co-head of digital transformation and senior counsel, about how artificial intelligence (AI) is shaping the future of financial markets and the key factors firms should...