On May 28, ISDA and the Futures Industry Association (FIA) published a paper regarding partial-tear up (PTU). The paper includes a comparison between PTU and other rebalancing tools and how PTU could evolve.
Under business-as-usual conditions, the central counterparty (CCP) is the seller to every buyer and buyer to every seller and therefore has a matched book. For every position/contract with a member, there is an equal and opposite position/contract with another member. This means the CCP has no market risk. If a member of a CCP defaults, this member cannot service its positions anymore and the CCP no longer has a matched book and consequently now is exposed to market risk. With every market move, the CCP will have to pay or receive variation margin on behalf of the defaulter.
The CCP will, as part of its default management process, try to sell the defaulter’s positions/contracts. This can be done either via a central limit order book, by using a broker, by a direct sale, by running an auction, or by a combination of these approaches. Under all these options, the positions/contracts in the defaulter’s portfolio will be sold and a market price established.
It is possible that the CCP may find it difficult to re-establish a matched book. In this very extreme situation, there are a number of possible tools for derivatives the CCP can use to restore a matched book: partial tear-up and forced allocation, invoicing back and possibly cash settlement.
This paper describes the tools to restore a matched book and reviews these tools against some key principles and criteria:
- Equitable risk distribution
- Impact on financial stability
- Risk reduction
- Incentives for participants
ISDA and FIA conclude that PTU is the fairest tool with the best incentive structure. However, the associations believe that, depending on the asset class, PTU could be adapted and improved and propose potential improvements.
The considerations in this paper need to be evaluated based on the nuances of specific products, such as physically-settled repos, cash equities, foreign exchange and swaps, subject to compression, as well as market depth, market liquidity, open interest and maturity of products, etc.
Documents (1) for Partial Tear-Up and Other Position Allocation Tools
Latest
Episode 56: Countdown to Treasury Clearing
With less than nine months to go until the first US Treasury clearing mandates come into force, BlackRock’s Tyler Wellensiek and BNY’s Nate Wuerffel discuss industry progress. Please view this page via Chrome to access the recording.
Response to Eurosystem Consultation on Appia
On April 22, ISDA responded to the Eurosystem consultation on the Appia roadmap. ISDA broadly supports the roadmap and its high level principles, while recommending that the principle on market access and integration should be expanded to explicitly address interoperability...
ISDA Responds to ESMA on PTRR Clearing Exemption
On April 20, ISDA submitted a response to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) consultation paper on a draft regulatory technical standard (RTS) for the post-trade risk reduction (PTRR) exemption from the derivatives clearing obligation under Article 4b of the...
Response on Competitiveness of EU Banking Sector
On April 17, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) targeted consultation on the competitiveness of the EU banking sector. The EU is aiming to bolster the ability of its financial markets and banking sector to grow, remain competitive and...