On June 11, 2021, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) submitted a joint response to the European Banking Authority (EBA) on its consultation on draft regulatory technical standards on the residual risk add-on (RRAO) in the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB). Article 325u(2) of the Capital Requirements Regulation provides guidance on the meaning of instruments referencing an exotic underlying and instruments bearing other residual risks. Instruments referencing exotic underlyings can be identified as soon as they have underlying exposures to risk factors that are outside the scope of the sensitivity based method or the default risk charge components of the FRTB standardized approach. The consultation paper has further specified a non-exhaustive list of instruments bearing residual risks, and a list of risks that do not constitute residual risks.
The industry appreciates the EBA’s efforts in developing regulatory standards to identify instruments exposed to residual risks. The RRAO constitutes a sizable part of the overall capital charge, so it is important to adequately define the perimeter of in-scope instruments and consider the appropriate level of the incremental capital charge and recognize the risk-reduction benefits of hedges where appropriate. This remains a key concern for the industry – in particular, the punitive treatment of constant maturity swap spread options.
Documents (1) for ISDA and AFME Respond to EBA on FRTB Residual Risk Add-On
Latest
Joint Response on RBA Consultation
On August 11, ISDA and FIA submitted a joint response to the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) on its consultation on guidance for Australia’s clearing and settlement facility resolution regime. The associations welcome publication of the draft guidance, which provides...
SwapsInfo H1 2025 and Q2 2025
Interest rate derivatives (IRD) trading activity increased in the first half of 2025, driven by continued interest rate volatility, evolving central bank policy expectations and persistent macroeconomic uncertainty. Trading in index credit derivatives also rose, as market participants responded to...
ISDA Response to IFSCA Consultation
On August 5, ISDA responded to the International Financial Services Centres Authority’s (IFSCA) consultation on reporting and clearing of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts booked in International Financial Services Centres (IFSC). In the response, ISDA provided the following recommendations: Not mandating...
ISDA Response to BIS on Tokenization
On July 30, ISDA submitted a response to a Bank for International Settlements (BIS) consultation on leveraging tokenization for payments and financial transactions. In the response, ISDA focused on the legal, regulatory and documentation issues relevant to the derivatives market,...