Legal Implications of Voluntary Carbon Credits

The transition to a low carbon economy is estimated to require significant funding globally. The voluntary carbon market continues to play a critical role in that transition by helping to channel funding into projects that reduce carbon emissions or remove carbon from the atmosphere.

A robust voluntary carbon market must be grounded in a strong legal foundation. Much of the process of creating, verifying and transferring the benefit of project activities that reduce emissions already exists within robust legal frameworks. As the market grows in size and complexity, however, secondary markets in fungible voluntary carbon credits (VCCs) would be significantly enhanced by steps being taken both nationally and internationally to better understand the legal nature of VCCs.

As with any intangible asset, the legal nature determines how VCCs as a fungible instrument can be created, bought, sold and retired. It affects what type of security may be taken and enforced in relation to VCCs and how that can be achieved, as well as how VCCs would be treated following an insolvency (including with regard to netting). It may also have an impact on broader considerations, including the regulatory, tax and accounting treatment of VCCs. In short, understanding the legal treatment of VCCs is necessary to achieve deep and liquid secondary markets, which, in turn, will enable the development of a clear price signal for carbon and allow funds to be efficiently channeled to emissions-reducing projects.

Furthering that legal understanding in different jurisdictions will help optimize the enormous potential that a global voluntary carbon market can offer. This whitepaper investigates the legal treatment of VCCs and considers certain other aspects of VCC transactions (such as when they might be regulated as derivatives). The paper also sets out recommended steps that can be taken to further develop legal certainty in VCCs at both a global and jurisdictional level.

Click on the attached PDF to read the paper in full. 

A supplemental paper covering France, Japan, Singapore is available HERE.

Documents (1) for Legal Implications of Voluntary Carbon Credits

Joint Response to EBA Consultation

On August 12, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the European Banking Authority’s discussion paper on certain taxonomy key performance indicators (KPIs) and other aspects of the Disclosures Delegated Act  under Article 8 of...

Response to JSCC on Clearing Fund Consolidation

On August 12, ISDA responded to the Japan Securities Clearing Corporation’s (JSCC) consultation on its proposal to consolidate clearing fund consumption, calculation and deposit segmentation across six clearing qualifications under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. ISDA members broadly support...

Response on CSDD Guidelines

On August 6, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on due diligence guidelines under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). While ISDA acknowledges that model contractual clauses can be a helpful resource for in-scope companies, there are...