ISDA and SIFMA submitted an amicus brief in support of the bankruptcy creditor counterparties in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas. The amicus brief argues that, under the terms of the 1992 Master ISDA, non-defaulting swap counterparties are neither required to (1) provide Reference Market-makers with a copy of the Credit Support Annex between them and the defaulting counterparty to complete the Market Quotation process, nor (2) take the defaulting counterparty’s creditworthiness into consideration when assessing the amount of “Loss.”
Documents (1) for In re Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
Latest
ISDA AGM Studio: Julia Hueckel and Chris Zuehlke
Julia Hueckel, director of global regulatory policy at Coinbase, and Chris Zuehlke, global head of Cumberland and partner at DRW, speak with Nicolette Cone, ISDA’s chief of staff and associate general counsel, on the rapidly evolving legislative framework for digital...
ISDA In Review – April 2026
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in April 2026.
Response to MAS on Recovery and Resolution
On May 8, ISDA and the FIA responded to the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) consultation on recovery and resolution planning and enhancement of resolution powers for capital market infrastructures. The response supports the proposed framework for recovery and orderly...
SwapsInfo First Quarter of 2026 Review
Trading activity in interest rate derivatives (IRD) and credit derivatives increased in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025. IRD traded notional grew by 38.1%, led by increased activity in overnight index swaps (OIS). Index...