ISDA and SIFMA submitted an amicus brief in support of the bankruptcy creditor counterparties in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas. The amicus brief argues that, under the terms of the 1992 Master ISDA, non-defaulting swap counterparties are neither required to (1) provide Reference Market-makers with a copy of the Credit Support Annex between them and the defaulting counterparty to complete the Market Quotation process, nor (2) take the defaulting counterparty’s creditworthiness into consideration when assessing the amount of “Loss.”
Documents (1) for In re Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
Latest
IRD Trading in the US, EU and UK
This research note analyzes changes in interest rate derivatives (IRD) trading activity in the US, EU and UK from 2021 to 2024. It examines how central bank interest rate policies influenced IRD trading volumes and how the composition of IRD...
Response to ESMA on Clearing Threshold Regime
On June 16, ISDA responded to the European Securities and Markets Authority's (ESMA) consultation on the new clearing threshold (CT) regime. The new CT regime, based on uncleared positions, was introduced in the context of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation...
Response to EC on Integration of EU Capital Market
On June 10, ISDA submitted a response to the European Commission's (EC) consultation on the integration of EU capital markets. The consultation was launched as part of the EC's Savings and Investment Union project. In the response, ISDA addressed themes...
ISDA Launches Pre-adherence Period for Notices Hub
ISDA has begun a pre-adherence process for the ISDA Notices Hub, enabling firms to sign up to a free protocol that will allow them to use the new platform when it launches on July 15. Under the ISDA Master Agreement,...