In the paper Targeted consultation on the review of the central clearing framework in the EU from February 2022, one of the measures proposed for consideration by the European Commission (EC) was the requirement for an “active account” (ie the requirement to “maintain[…] an active account with an EU central counterparty (CCP) for the products that are available inside and outside the EU”). We understand that such a measure would require all, or a subset of, EU clearing participants to have an account at an EU CCP or a tier-1 CCP in addition to, or as an alternative to, an account at a tier-two third-country CCP.
We accept that having viable options is always good risk management, but note however that this is a tool that could, depending on how it is designed, add costs and risks for EU clearing participants (be they clearing members or clients).
As we understand that this proposal is under serious consideration by the EC, we provide analysis as to the potential consequences of different design choices.
We look at three policy options:
- Policy Option 1: No active accounts
- Policy Option 2: Active accounts without a target minimum level of activity
- Policy Option 3: Active accounts with qualitative and quantitative usage requirements – minimum activity levels
For each policy option we analyze the impact on market participants and how the policy option could be operationalized and supervised.
We also would like to refer to our paper A Roadmap to Make European Clearing More Attractive for proposals on how to make clearing in the EU more attractive without disadvantaging EU firms.
Documents (1) for Technical Paper on Active Accounts
Latest
Joint Trades Submit Letter to BCBS Calling for Recalibration of Cryptoasset Prudential Standards
ISDA, in partnership with a coalition of leading global financial trade associations (“Joint Trades”), and with advisory support from Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Ashurst, and Sullivan & Cromwell, submitted a letter to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). The...
ISDA Response on Common Carbon Data Model
On August 12, ISDA responded to a consultation from the Climate Data Steering Committee (CDSC) on a Common Carbon Credit Data Model. ISDA members believe the Group-of-20 carbon data model initiative is a positive step in addressing data gaps and...
Joint Response on RBA Consultation
On August 11, ISDA and FIA submitted a joint response to the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) on its consultation on guidance for Australia’s clearing and settlement facility resolution regime. The associations welcome publication of the draft guidance, which provides...
SwapsInfo H1 2025 and Q2 2025
Interest rate derivatives (IRD) trading activity increased in the first half of 2025, driven by continued interest rate volatility, evolving central bank policy expectations and persistent macroeconomic uncertainty. Trading in index credit derivatives also rose, as market participants responded to...