Singapore is taking a number of steps to achieve its ambition of net-zero carbon emissions by approximately 2050, including the progressive raising of carbon taxes from 2024 and the launch of the Singapore Green Plan 2030, which sets sustainability targets to be achieved over the next 10 years.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore has complemented these initiatives by setting out a strategy to strengthen the resilience of the financial sector to environmental risks, and to position Singapore as a leading center for sustainable finance.
A number of financial products linked to environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors have emerged globally to help firms achieve their sustainability objectives and hedge climate risk. This includes sustainability-linked derivatives (SLDs), which embed a sustainability-linked cashflow in a derivatives structure and use key performance indicators (KPIs) to monitor compliance with ESG targets. However, it is necessary for users to understand how these instruments fit into existing regulatory regimes.
This paper focuses on the regulation of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives in Singapore. The intention is to describe potential regulatory approaches to OTC SLDs and provide guidance to help market participants develop their own assessments.
Two categories of SLDs are covered in this paper:
• Category 1 SLDs: The KPIs and related cashflows are embedded within the derivatives transaction. An example of a Category 1 SLD is a cross-currency interest rate swap that provides additional payments, spread ratchets or a preferential exchange rate when a KPI is met.
• Category 2 SLDs: The KPIs and related cashflows are set out in a separate agreement that references underlying (generally vanilla) derivatives transactions for setting the reference amount to calculate the KPI-linked cashflow. The terms (including pricing) of the underlying transactions (which may include transactions with other affiliates of the parties) would generally not be affected. An example of a Category 2 SLD is an agreement to make a payment if a counterparty meets its KPIs, calculated as a percentage of the notional amount of unrelated, separately documented derivatives transactions.
Documents (1) for Regulatory Framework for Sustainability-linked Derivatives: Singapore Analysis
Latest
Joint Response to EBA Consultation
On August 12, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the European Banking Authority’s discussion paper on certain taxonomy key performance indicators (KPIs) and other aspects of the Disclosures Delegated Act under Article 8 of...
Response to JSCC on Clearing Fund Consolidation
On August 12, ISDA responded to the Japan Securities Clearing Corporation’s (JSCC) consultation on its proposal to consolidate clearing fund consumption, calculation and deposit segmentation across six clearing qualifications under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. ISDA members broadly support...
Response on CSDD Guidelines
On August 6, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on due diligence guidelines under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). While ISDA acknowledges that model contractual clauses can be a helpful resource for in-scope companies, there are...
Response to BoE on Extension of Settlement Hours
On August 6, ISDA responded to the Bank of England’s (BoE) consultation paper on the extension of settlement hours for RTGS and CHAPS, the UK’s high-value payment system. ISDA supports the BoE’s plan to extend RTGS and CHAPS settlement hours...