On February 10, ISDA and the Institute of International Finance (IIF) submitted a joint response to the International Organization of Securities Commissions’ (IOSCO) consultation report on compliance carbon markets (CCMs) and discussion paper on voluntary carbon markets (VCMs).
The response focuses on several themes that leverage the IIF and ISDA’s engagement on issues relating to the environmental integrity of carbon credits and the integrity of carbon markets to date. The two organizations welcome IOSCO’s holistic approach to fostering the development of sound and well-functioning compliance and voluntary carbon markets, and they strongly believe carbon markets are a critical component of the global response to climate change and the transition to net zero.
The response makes a number of specific suggestions, including:
- Encouraging IOSCO to leverage the work of key VCM governance bodies, such as the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market, to support greater standardization and strengthen supply- and demand-side integrity;
- Providing guidance on how securities and financial regulators can and should use their expertise, authority, and scope of influence to enhance market integrity, recognizing the limits of such regulators with respect to dimensions of environmental integrity concerns per se;
- Requesting clarification of the legal classification and regulatory treatment of carbon credits, also distinguishing between the legal nature and regulatory status of VCMs themselves and the nature of transactions in VCMs (eg, derivatives transactions with an underlying VCC, such as listed futures or over-the-counter forwards or options);
- Requesting continuous monitoring of the development and linkages between CCMs and VCMs to ensure that, as these markets develop, any regulation remains appropriate and fit for purpose.
Documents (1) for ISDA, IIF Respond to IOSCO Consultations on Compliance and Voluntary Carbon Markets
Latest
Joint Response to EBA Consultation
On August 12, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the European Banking Authority’s discussion paper on certain taxonomy key performance indicators (KPIs) and other aspects of the Disclosures Delegated Act under Article 8 of...
Response to JSCC on Clearing Fund Consolidation
On August 12, ISDA responded to the Japan Securities Clearing Corporation’s (JSCC) consultation on its proposal to consolidate clearing fund consumption, calculation and deposit segmentation across six clearing qualifications under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. ISDA members broadly support...
Response on CSDD Guidelines
On August 6, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on due diligence guidelines under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). While ISDA acknowledges that model contractual clauses can be a helpful resource for in-scope companies, there are...
Response to BoE on Extension of Settlement Hours
On August 6, ISDA responded to the Bank of England’s (BoE) consultation paper on the extension of settlement hours for RTGS and CHAPS, the UK’s high-value payment system. ISDA supports the BoE’s plan to extend RTGS and CHAPS settlement hours...
