US bank capital experts packing their bags for an August vacation may well have had to ditch the John Grisham in favour of somewhat heavier reading, after US prudential regulators published their keenly-awaited Basel III ‘endgame’ proposals on July 27. But while the 1,000-plus-page notice of proposed rulemaking may lack the thrills and spills of Grisham’s The Pelican Brief, it does contain one or two plot twists and surprises of its own.
Chief among them is the decision to replace the advanced approaches with a new expanded risk-based approach (ERBA) – a methodology that no longer provides banks with the option to use internal models for credit risk, counterparty credit risk and operational risk. The only area where sophisticated banks still have the option to use internal models is market risk. Under the proposed framework, all US banks with total assets of $100 billion or more will have to calculate risk-weighted assets amounts using both the current US standardised approach and the new ERBA and use whichever is higher – an approach that differs from that taken by regulators in other jurisdictions.
The US agencies estimate the new proposals will result in an aggregate 16% increase in common equity tier-one capital requirements for banks, but with the increase falling principally on the largest and most complex banks. That’s despite the roughly 3.7 times increase in capital at US global systemically important banks since the 2008 financial crisis. ISDA plans to run a quantitative impact study to get a more detailed breakdown of how the rules will play out in terms of capital requirements. We’ll also delve into the detail of the proposals during our dedicated capital events in the fourth quarter – the London event on November 30 is already open for registration (isda.org/events) and the New York event on December 12 will open shortly. Spaces will be strictly limited, so make sure you don’t miss out.
Our cover story for this issue is also capital-related – it explores the efforts of ISDA, Deloitte and a group of banks to develop an approach to help assess the impact of climate-related risks on short-dated trading book assets. Having developed a conceptual framework for scenario analysis earlier this year, the next step will be to create a set of scenarios for the trading book – work that is already underway.
Click on the PDF below to read IQ in full.
Documents (1) for Green Future – IQ September 2023
Latest
Joint Response to 2026 US G-SIB Surcharge Proposal
On June 18, ISDA, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the Institute of International Finance submitted a joint response to US agencies on proposed changes to the surcharge for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs). The associations welcome the...
Eyeing the Basel III Finish Line
An effective regulatory capital framework relies on multiple ingredients, from appropriate drafting to rigorous testing and consultation. Even minor calibration distortions can inflate capital requirements, which could negatively affect the capacity of banks to support deep and liquid markets, with...
Joint Comment Letter on Basel III Endgame Proposal
The Institute of International Finance (IIF), the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) today submitted a joint comment letter to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the...
Joint Response to 2026 US Basel III Proposal
On June 18, ISDA, the Institute of International Finance and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association submitted a joint response to the 2026 US Basel III notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR). The response focuses on the Fundamental Review of...
