On March 26, ISDA and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association submitted a joint response to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on the proposed reporting revisions of the Call Report, FFIEC 101 and FFIEC 102, which are designed to reflect the implementation of the Basel III Endgame proposal.
It is important that the Agencies review the comments on the Basel III Endgame proposal submitted by the Associations and consider these before finalizing the reporting requirements. In addition, the proposed reporting requirements require significant effort to implement. Thus, it is essential that the final reporting forms and instructions be published with sufficient time for banking organizations to make the necessary changes to their systems and calculations.
Documents (1) for ISDA-SIFMA Response to Proposed FFIEC Reporting Revisions
Latest
ISDA, IIF Response to PRA on Market Risk Framework
On September 12, ISDA and the Institute of International Finance (IIF) submitted a joint response to the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA) consultation on adjustments to the market risk capital framework (CP 17/25). ISDA and the IIF strongly believe the market...
ISDA Response on Clearing Costs
On September 8, ISDA responded to consultation by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on a draft regulatory technical standard on clearing fees and associated costs (article 7c(4) of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR)). In the response, ISDA...
ISDA Response on Margin Transparency
On September 8, ISDA responded to a consultation by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on a draft regulatory technical standard under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR 3.0) on margin transparency requirements. ISDA’s members are supportive of margin...
Paper on Liquidity Assessment for Single-name CDS
On September 5, ISDA submitted a paper to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Commission in support of its earlier response to ESMA’s Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MIFIR) review consultation package 4 (CP4) on transparency...