On March 26, ISDA and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association submitted a joint response to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on the proposed reporting revisions of the Call Report, FFIEC 101 and FFIEC 102, which are designed to reflect the implementation of the Basel III Endgame proposal.
It is important that the Agencies review the comments on the Basel III Endgame proposal submitted by the Associations and consider these before finalizing the reporting requirements. In addition, the proposed reporting requirements require significant effort to implement. Thus, it is essential that the final reporting forms and instructions be published with sufficient time for banking organizations to make the necessary changes to their systems and calculations.
Documents (1) for ISDA-SIFMA Response to Proposed FFIEC Reporting Revisions
Latest
ISDA Guidance: SOFR Publication on Good Friday 2026
ISDA guidance for parties to over-the-counter derivative transactions affected by expected non-publication of SOFR on Good Friday in 2026. Please note that the guidance may be updated from time to time.
ISDA Paper on FRTB Rules in Brazil
On March 24, ISDA submitted a paper to Banco Central do Brazil’s (BCB) on its implementation of the revised market risk framework under the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB), which represents an important step toward strengthening prudential standards...
IQ Interview with Mark Uyeda
Mandatory clearing of US Treasury securities is due to begin at the end of this year under rules finalized by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2023. SEC commissioner Mark Uyeda talks to IQ about the benefits of clearing...
Response to FCA on CFI Codes for Transparency
On March 19, ISDA responded to Chapter 3 of the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Quarterly Consultation CP26/8 on transparency requirements for financial instruments under Market Conduct Sourcebook (MAR) 11. Sections 3.11-3.13 of the consultation paper explain a discrepancy between...