Joint Trades Submit Letter to BCBS Calling for Recalibration of Cryptoasset Prudential Standards

ISDA, in partnership with a coalition of leading global financial trade associations and with advisory support from Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Ashurst and Sullivan & Cromwell, submitted a letter to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). The letter calls for a pause and recalibration of the cryptoasset exposures standard (ie, SCO60).

The asociations are urging BCBS to delay the implementation of SCO60, currently scheduled for January 2026, to allow time for a targeted consultation and redesign of the framework. The letter argues that the current standard imposes overly conservative and punitive capital requirements that do not accurately reflect the actual risks of cryptoassets and are inconsistent with established market risk practices. The letter emphasizes the need for a more balanced approach that aligns with actual risk profiles and encourages responsible innovation within the regulatory framework.

To that end, the associations propose a set of non-exhaustive recommendations to improve the cryptoasset standard, in line with core principles of safety, soundness and technology neutrality, including:

  1. Eliminating the distinction between permissioned and permissionless ledgers for Group 1 classification.
  2. Revising classification condition 2.
  3. Reconsidering the treatment of regulated stablecoins.
  4. Recognizing certain cryptoassets as eligible collateral.
  5. Reassessing the treatment of Group 2 cryptoassets.
  6. Allowing the use of internal models for market and counterparty risk.

Alongside the letter, the asociation also released a detailed report, The Impact of DLT in Capital Markets: Ready for Adoption, Time to Act. This report underscores the growing significance of the cryptoasset market and highlights the transformative potential of distributed ledger  technology (DLT) in capital markets. It argues that the evolution of the market has rendered many of the assumptions underpinning the Basel standard outdated, and that a reassessment is now necessary.

ISDA Response on Hedge Accounting Guidance

On August 14, ISDA responded to an exposure draft from the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). ISDA broadly supports the FASB’s proposed targeted improvements to hedge accounting, including allowing interest rate hedging of held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities, recognizing all Secured...

Joint Response to EBA Consultation

On August 12, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the European Banking Authority’s discussion paper on certain taxonomy key performance indicators (KPIs) and other aspects of the Disclosures Delegated Act  under Article 8 of...

Response to JSCC on Clearing Fund Consolidation

On August 12, ISDA responded to the Japan Securities Clearing Corporation’s (JSCC) consultation on its proposal to consolidate clearing fund consumption, calculation and deposit segmentation across six clearing qualifications under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. ISDA members broadly support...

Response on CSDD Guidelines

On August 6, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on due diligence guidelines under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). While ISDA acknowledges that model contractual clauses can be a helpful resource for in-scope companies, there are...