ISDA has published a paper that explains why stress scenarios that central counterparties (CCPs) use for default fund sizing cannot be used for forward-looking initial margin (IM) simulators.
Typically, stress scenarios used by CCPs consist of a single step, transitioning directly from business-as-usual to stressed market conditions. For default fund sizing or liquidity requirement determinations, these one-step scenarios are sufficient because the focus is on measuring absolute loss under stress.
However, for many CCPs, the IM response function depends on the path taken during market stress events. Their models may yield different IM requirements based on how stress unfolds over time. As a result, IM simulators require scenarios that replicate the day-by-day progression of stress events and use this time series as input for margin simulation.
Most systemically important CCPs, whose margin levels are particularly relevant for clearing users, employ some form of filtered historical value-at-risk (VaR) model to calculate their IM.
These models have three pathways through which the different trajectories of a shock can influence margin levels:
- The number of stressed scenarios influencing the VaR calculation;
- The impact on the volatility estimate used for historical filtering;
- The compounding effect of overlapping returns for margin periods of risk longer than one day.
This paper examines these three mechanisms and argues that for CCPs with path-dependent models, given the complex relationship between stress scenarios, VaR models and potential additional tools, scenario simulation should proceed incrementally.
Documents (1) for ISDA Publishes Paper on Stress Scenarios for Forward Looking CCP IM Simulators
Latest
ISDA In Review – September 2025
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in September 2025.
A Path to Greater CFTC-SEC Alignment
Earlier this week, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) held a roundtable on regulatory harmonization – an initiative we wholeheartedly support. The US regulatory framework has evolved over time to facilitate financial markets...
Updated OTC Derivatives Compliance Calendar
ISDA has updated its global calendar of compliance deadlines and regulatory dates for the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives space.
Working Towards Tokenized Collateral
One of the lessons learned from recent market shocks – including the 2020 dash for cash and the UK gilt market crisis in 2022 – is that when volatility strikes and market participants must suddenly generate large amounts of cash...