Clients accessing a central counterparty (CCP) via a client clearing service provider (CCSP) for over-the-counter (OTC) and exchange-traded derivatives should consider what may happen to their positions and collateral in a scenario in which the CCSP defaults.
While regulatory regimes provide for various porting mechanisms to transfer client positions to another CCSP, successful porting – of both positions and collateral – can never be guaranteed. Clients should therefore be aware of how the choice of their clearing arrangements will affect the likelihood of successful porting. Clients should also monitor the creditworthiness of their CCSP so they can proactively alter their clearing arrangements ahead of a CCSP default. This would reduce their reliance on porting mechanisms.
Clients should not rely on porting and should be mindful of what may happen if their CCSP defaults – however unlikely this might be. The successful porting of clients after the default of a CCSP can be highly uncertain and largely depends on the clients’ access to the CCP, the provisions that have been made and the local legal framework.
If required, porting can be a challenging process. If the porting of client positions is not completed within the short time window set by the CCP (defined in a matter of days or even hours), the CCP will trigger default management procedures for client positions, meaning there is a risk that clients waiting for positions to be ported might get closed out.
Click on the attached PDF to read the full paper.
Documents (1) for Raising Clients’ Awareness on Portability
Latest
ISDA Market Practice Note for the Rebasing of European Inflation Indices
ISDA Market Practice Note for Rebasing of the: FRC - Excluding Tobacco-Non-Revised Consumer Price Index EUR - Excluding Tobacco-Non-revised Consumer Price Index ITL - Inflation for Blue Collar Workers and Employees-Excluding Tobacco Consumer Price Index SEK – Non-revised Consumer Price...
Guidance for EU IM Model Application for ISDA SIMM®
EU financial and non-financial EU counterparties exchanging IM based on ISDA SIMM® should have already submitted an initial application for authorisation to their competent authority (CA), and ECB if applicable. If not, they should do so timely to ensure continued...
Joint Response on Stress Testing Framework
On February 23, ISDA, the Bank Policy Institute, the American Bankers Association, the Financial Services Forum, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the US Chamber of Commerce jointly responded to the US Federal Reserve’s consultation on the stress...
Joint Letter on Italian 2026 Budget Law
On February 23, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe and the International Securities Lending Association jointly sent a letter to the Italian tax authorities about changes to withholding tax on dividends made in the 2026 budget law, which...
