ISDA Paper on Proposed Liquidity Assessment for Single-name CDS

On September 5, ISDA submitted a paper to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Commission in support of its earlier response to ESMA’s Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MIFIR) review consultation package 4 (CP4) on transparency for derivatives. The paper argues that the proposed assessment of five-year single-name credit default swaps (CDS) that reference global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) as liquid, proposed in CP4 for the purposes of public transparency, is fundamentally flawed. It highlights that the methodology used to assess the liquidity of five-year single-name CDS referencing G-SIBs is markedly different from the methodology used to assess other derivatives and bonds and presents analysis that shows these instruments would be deemed illiquid if they had been assessed in a way that was consistent with other instruments. This is important, as it dictates whether trades in these instruments should be made public in real time or deferred. ISDA has consistently advocated that making trades in illiquid instruments transparent in real time places undue risk on liquidity providers.

Documents (1) for ISDA Paper on Proposed Liquidity Assessment for Single-name CDS

Joint Response to EBA Consultation

On August 12, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the European Banking Authority’s discussion paper on certain taxonomy key performance indicators (KPIs) and other aspects of the Disclosures Delegated Act  under Article 8 of...

Response to JSCC on Clearing Fund Consolidation

On August 12, ISDA responded to the Japan Securities Clearing Corporation’s (JSCC) consultation on its proposal to consolidate clearing fund consumption, calculation and deposit segmentation across six clearing qualifications under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. ISDA members broadly support...

Response on CSDD Guidelines

On August 6, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on due diligence guidelines under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). While ISDA acknowledges that model contractual clauses can be a helpful resource for in-scope companies, there are...