On September 4, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on amendments to delegated regulation (EU) 2017.567. The key area of interest for ISDA was the proposed insertion of a new article 16a that establishes what constitutes a post-trade risk reduction service (PTRRS) for the purposes of article 31(1) of the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MIFIR). This article of MIFIR exempts PTRRS from post-trade transparency, the derivatives trading obligation and best execution requirements. The previous version of MIFIR article 31 only exempted portfolio compressions from these obligations. As PTRRS are not defined in MIFIR, a legal gap exists that the amendments to the Commission Delegated Regulation (CDR) (EU) 2017/567 are intended to address.
ISDA’s response to the consultation supports the thrust of the proposed amendments – in particular, the expansion of PTRRS to include portfolio rebalancing and basis risk optimization exercises in addition to portfolio compressions. The response also suggests several amendments to the drafting of article 16a for greater clarity and the avoidance of unnecessary complexity.
Documents (1) for ISDA Response to EC on Amendments to Delegated Regulation
Latest
Response to ESMA Guarantees
On April 30, ISDA responded to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) consultation paper on guarantees as central counterparty (CCP) collateral and certain aspects of CCP investment policy. ISDA broadly supports ESMA’s proposed draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) to...
ISDA AGM Studio: Jenny Cosco and Jason Granet
Jenny Cosco, global head of government relations and regulatory strategy at LSEG, and Jason Granet, chief investment officer at BNY, speak with Tara Kruse, ISDA’s global head of derivative products and infrastructure, about how firms can manage liquidity pressures during...
Updated OTC Derivatives Compliance Calendar
ISDA has updated its global calendar of compliance deadlines and regulatory dates for the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives space.
Capital Models Benchmarking: A Framework for Counterparty Credit Risk Internal Models
When firms implement capital models in line with supervisory standards, a range of interpretative and implementation choices inevitably arise. These choices reflect differences in modeling approaches, data availability, system architecture and risk management practices, and can lead to variation in...
