On September 10, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) and the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA) submitted a joint response to the European Commission’s (EC) call for evidence on reducing the administrative burden in environmental legislation. The joint response supports the EC’s objective of reducing unnecessary administrative burdens while ensuring environmental objectives remain intact. The associations believe that simplification efforts focused on the real economy are essential to improving the quality of information, avoiding overlapping rules and enabling effective sustainable finance.
In particular, the joint response highlights the need to:
- Ensure regulatory coherence with the existing sustainable finance framework (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, Taxonomy, Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and sectoral rules), avoiding duplication and double reporting.
- Maintain an exemption of financial products and services from the scope of the Green Claims Directive.
- Clarify that Deforestation Regulation due diligence obligations should apply to lead operators and traders rather than downstream financial institutions, which are already comprehensively regulated under EU sustainable finance rules.
Documents (1) for ISDA, EFAMA, AFME Respond to EC on Reducing Administrative Burden in Environmental Legislation
Latest
Natixis CIB Adopts ISDA’s DRR
ISDA has announced that Natixis CIB has adopted ISDA’s Digital Regulatory Reporting (DRR) solution, enabling the bank to meet regulatory reporting requirements more efficiently and accurately. The ISDA DRR uses the Common Domain Model (CDM) – an open-source data standard...
Paper on MIFIR PTT
On April 7, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME), the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) and the European Banking Federation (EBF) published a paper on proposals relating to post-trade transparency (PTT) under the Markets in Financial Instruments...
Data Integrity for Single-sided Reporting
On April 2, ISDA published a paper on why single-sided reporting does not compromise the quality and integrity of data received by supervisors. The paper addresses concerns among regulators that moving from dual-sided reporting would adversely affect the quality of...
Paper on Removal of SI Regime
On April 2, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) and the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) published an update to a paper, originally published in October 2025, on the practical implications of the systematic internalizer (SI) regime...