On February 27, ISDA responded to a joint consultation by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) and the Securities Futures Commission (SFC) on proposed amendments to schedule 2 of the clearing rules for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. The proposed amendments introduce permanent calculation periods going forward – ie, every March 1 to May 31 and September 1 to November 30 each year, with effect from March 1, 2027.
ISDA welcomes the amendment, which provides greater regulatory certainty and removes the need for periodic legislative amendments to update the calculation periods. ISDA also notes that having a permanent way of determining the calculation periods is in line with practices in Europe and the UK.
In addition, ISDA suggests regulators should consider broadening the exemptive relief for clearing, which is limited to transactions resulting from multilateral portfolio compression exercises, to include those resulting from post-trade risk reduction exercises in a future review, like other jurisdictions, such as Australia, Europe and the UK.
Documents (1) for ISDA Response to HKMA SFC Consultation on Clearing Rules
Latest
Response to ESMA Guarantees
On April 30, ISDA responded to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) consultation paper on guarantees as central counterparty (CCP) collateral and certain aspects of CCP investment policy. ISDA broadly supports ESMA’s proposed draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) to...
ISDA AGM Studio: Jenny Cosco and Jason Granet
Jenny Cosco, global head of government relations and regulatory strategy at LSEG, and Jason Granet, chief investment officer at BNY, speak with Tara Kruse, ISDA’s global head of derivative products and infrastructure, about how firms can manage liquidity pressures during...
Updated OTC Derivatives Compliance Calendar
ISDA has updated its global calendar of compliance deadlines and regulatory dates for the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives space.
Capital Models Benchmarking: A Framework for Counterparty Credit Risk Internal Models
When firms implement capital models in line with supervisory standards, a range of interpretative and implementation choices inevitably arise. These choices reflect differences in modeling approaches, data availability, system architecture and risk management practices, and can lead to variation in...