ISDA Responds to CPMI-IOSCO Consultation on Margin Proposals

On June 29, ISDA submitted a response to a consultation from the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) on updated guidance and public quantitative disclosures to implement the 2025 margin proposals.

ISDA’s response makes the following points:

  • Retain the final report language on margin simulators;
  • Require multi-step, day-by-day stress replay to reflect path dependency;
  • Enhance standardization of central counterparty outputs and transparency on stress scenarios and add-ons;
  • Clarify that simulators are not a substitute for disclosures needed to support replicability; and
  • Refine the backward-looking responsiveness measure by reporting responsiveness over pre-defined historical stress periods rather than via a one-year window.

Documents (1) for ISDA Responds to CPMI-IOSCO Consultation on Margin Proposals

Transition to Mandatory Central Clearing

US Treasury securities sit at the heart of global financial markets and serve as one of the primary forms of high-quality collateral across derivatives and securities financing markets. The transition to mandatory central clearing of US Treasuries therefore has implications...

ISDA Publishes Updated ISDA SIMM Governance

ISDA has published an updated version of the ISDA SIMM® Governance Framework, which sets out the principles under which the ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model® operates and the process through which it will be reviewed and amended on a consistent...

ISDA Response to PRA IMA Consultation

On September 18, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe, the Institute of International Finance and UK Finance submitted a joint response to the UK Prudential Regulation Authority consultation on adjustments to the internal model approach (IMA) for the...

Calibration Test – IQ September 2026

Calibrating capital requirements is a highly complex undertaking and getting it wrong can have serious consequences. Too much lenience might lead to banks holding insufficient capital to mitigate their risks. But excess conservatism can put balance sheets under strain, forcing...