US bank capital experts packing their bags for an August vacation may well have had to ditch the John Grisham in favour of somewhat heavier reading, after US prudential regulators published their keenly-awaited Basel III ‘endgame’ proposals on July 27. But while the 1,000-plus-page notice of proposed rulemaking may lack the thrills and spills of Grisham’s The Pelican Brief, it does contain one or two plot twists and surprises of its own.
Chief among them is the decision to replace the advanced approaches with a new expanded risk-based approach (ERBA) – a methodology that no longer provides banks with the option to use internal models for credit risk, counterparty credit risk and operational risk. The only area where sophisticated banks still have the option to use internal models is market risk. Under the proposed framework, all US banks with total assets of $100 billion or more will have to calculate risk-weighted assets amounts using both the current US standardised approach and the new ERBA and use whichever is higher – an approach that differs from that taken by regulators in other jurisdictions.
The US agencies estimate the new proposals will result in an aggregate 16% increase in common equity tier-one capital requirements for banks, but with the increase falling principally on the largest and most complex banks. That’s despite the roughly 3.7 times increase in capital at US global systemically important banks since the 2008 financial crisis. ISDA plans to run a quantitative impact study to get a more detailed breakdown of how the rules will play out in terms of capital requirements. We’ll also delve into the detail of the proposals during our dedicated capital events in the fourth quarter – the London event on November 30 is already open for registration (isda.org/events) and the New York event on December 12 will open shortly. Spaces will be strictly limited, so make sure you don’t miss out.
Our cover story for this issue is also capital-related – it explores the efforts of ISDA, Deloitte and a group of banks to develop an approach to help assess the impact of climate-related risks on short-dated trading book assets. Having developed a conceptual framework for scenario analysis earlier this year, the next step will be to create a set of scenarios for the trading book – work that is already underway.
Click on the PDF below to read IQ in full.
Documents (1) for Green Future – IQ September 2023
Latest
The CPI Quandary
The recent US government shutdown didn’t just create weeks of political drama – it also left inflation-linked swaps dealers with a major headache: how should they determine an initial value for new trades given the US Bureau of Labor Statistics...
ISDA Response to HMT, BoE on UK CCPs
On November 18, ISDA submitted its responses to the Bank of England (BoE) consultation on ensuring the resilience of central counterparties (CCPs) and the UK Treasury’s (HMT) two draft CCP statutory instruments (SIs). These consultations form part of the update...
Doubling Down on Appropriate Trading Book Capital
Throughout ISDA’s 40th anniversary year, we’ve been reflecting on the quest for greater consistency and efficiency that underpins everything we’ve achieved since 1985. It was at the heart of the original efforts to bring greater standardization to the nascent derivatives...
Determining Initial Reference Index for New Trades
On November 25, 2025, ISDA published a Market Practice Note (MPN) to recommend a specific methodology that market participants could elect to use for the purposes of determining the Initial Reference Index for certain new inflation derivative transactions given that...
