On August 5, ISDA responded to the International Financial Services Centres Authority’s (IFSCA) consultation on reporting and clearing of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts booked in International Financial Services Centres (IFSC). In the response, ISDA provided the following recommendations:
- Not mandating central clearing of equity and credit derivatives and allowing bilateral clearing of credit and equity derivatives. ISDA underscores the importance for IFSC-based central counterparties (CCPs) to obtain the necessary recognition/exemption from home regulators of key foreign bank branches.
- Phased implementation of margin requirements in line with the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives based on market readiness.
- Permitting broader issuer eligibility, including funds, insurance companies and pension funds registered with the IFSCA, to deepen market participation and liquidity.
- Removing one-to-one hedging requirements for OTC derivatives, especially those referencing foreign or IFSC-listed securities, to align with global practice and support flexible risk management.
- Clarifying trade reporting obligations so only IFSC-registered entities (and not offshore counterparties) are required to report to an IFSC trade repository.
- Encouraging alignment with global data standards (eg, the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and IOSCO unique trade identifier, unique product identifier and critical data elements), with the IFSCA to consult on the detailed reporting format and requirements.
ISDA also offered to engage with the IFSCA bilaterally on central clearing mandates, trade reporting and margin framework implementation.
Documents (1) for ISDA Response to IFSCA on Derivatives Reporting and Clearing
Latest
ISDA Response on Hedge Accounting Guidance
On August 14, ISDA responded to an exposure draft from the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). ISDA broadly supports the FASB’s proposed targeted improvements to hedge accounting, including allowing interest rate hedging of held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities, recognizing all Secured...
Joint Response to EBA Consultation
On August 12, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the European Banking Authority’s discussion paper on certain taxonomy key performance indicators (KPIs) and other aspects of the Disclosures Delegated Act under Article 8 of...
Response to JSCC on Clearing Fund Consolidation
On August 12, ISDA responded to the Japan Securities Clearing Corporation’s (JSCC) consultation on its proposal to consolidate clearing fund consumption, calculation and deposit segmentation across six clearing qualifications under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. ISDA members broadly support...
Response on CSDD Guidelines
On August 6, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on due diligence guidelines under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). While ISDA acknowledges that model contractual clauses can be a helpful resource for in-scope companies, there are...