On March 3, ISDA, the Institute of International Finance (IIF) and the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA) submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision consultation on machine-readable Pillar 3 disclosure.
The associations support the Basel Committee’s objective to enhance Pillar 3 disclosures through machine-readable formats and the phased approach it has proposed. The success of the initiative will depend on global consistency, interoperability and clarity of implementation, as experience with regulatory reporting has shown that divergent interpretations and firm-specific implementations drive fragmentation and unnecessary costs.
Rather than creating new frameworks from scratch, the associations strongly encourage the publication of requirements not only as legal text but also as unambiguous, machine-executable logic, leveraging existing open-source, market-tested standards such as the Common Domain Model and ISDA’s Digital Regulatory Reporting initiative. This would promote consistent implementation, reduce duplication and long-term maintenance costs, improve data quality and support integration with other regulatory data sets.
Documents (1) for ISDA, IIF, GFMA Respond to Basel Committee on Machine-readable Pillar 3 Disclosure
Latest
US Treasury Repo Clearing Indicators May 2026
The ISDA-Actrix US Treasury Repo Market Clearing Indicators illustrate central clearing adoption in the US Treasury repo market. Sponsored cleared repo volumes are used as a proxy to monitor client participation in central clearing, the key objective of the Securities...
ISDA, FIA, GFMA, CMC, CMCE Respond to IOSCO on Best Practices for OTC Commodity Derivatives
ISDA, FIA, the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA), the Commodity Markets Council (CMC) and the Commodity Markets Council Europe (CMCE), have responded to the International Organization of Securities Commissions' (IOSCO) consultation report on best practices for over-the-counter (OTC) commodity derivatives...
Joint Response to 2026 US G-SIB Surcharge Proposal
On June 18, ISDA, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the Institute of International Finance submitted a joint response to US agencies on proposed changes to the surcharge for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs). The associations welcome the...
Eyeing the Basel III Finish Line
An effective regulatory capital framework relies on multiple ingredients, from appropriate drafting to rigorous testing and consultation. Even minor calibration distortions can inflate capital requirements, which could negatively affect the capacity of banks to support deep and liquid markets, with...