On January 30, ISDA responded to the UK Fair and Effective Markets Review (FEMR). ISDA raised the following issues: new rules should be considered after an assessment of the impact of current regulatory reforms; ill-considered cross-border regulation reduces competition and balkanizes markets; and standardization is more appropriate for some FICC markets than others. It would also not be appropriate to include undertakings to comply with a market code into contracts, as it could create market and legal risks.
Documents (1) for ISDA responds to Fair and Effective Markets Review
Latest
Launch of ISDA Notices Hub and Protocol
ISDA has launched the ISDA Notices Hub and the ISDA 2025 Notices Hub Protocol, giving users a faster and more efficient method for delivering critical notices and reducing the uncertainty and risk of losses that can result from delays. The...
Response to Voluntary Carbon Markets Consultation
On July 10, ISDA responded to the UK government’s consultation on voluntary carbon and nature markets. The UK should continue to play a leading role in promoting the consistent legal treatment of carbon credits internationally, with the development of global...
ISDA Response – ROC Consultation on Revised CDE Version 4
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) response to the Regulatory Oversight Committee (ROC) consultation on the harmonisation of critical OTC derivatives data elements (CDE) revised CDE Technical Guidance – version 4, submitted to the ROC on January 24,...
ISDA response to ESMA MiFIR Review Consultation
On July 11, ISDA submitted a response to the European Securities and Markets Authority's (ESMA) fourth package of Level 2 consultation under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation Review (MiFIR), on transparency for derivatives, package orders and input/output data for...