The purpose of this matrix is to capture the latest Counterparty ID waterfalls for various jurisdictions to reference as industry standard. Counterparty IDs are used to identify the counterparties, including reporting counterparties, to a transaction. Most reporting regulations specify allowable values for party identification, however, where such values are not available, the reporting party may need to use an alternative party identifier. Reporting jurisdictions may have different preferred waterfalls for alternative Counterparty IDs.
Documents (1) for Counterparty ID Waterfall
Latest
ISDA Response – ROC Consultation on Revised CDE Version 4
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) response to the Regulatory Oversight Committee (ROC) consultation on the harmonisation of critical OTC derivatives data elements (CDE) revised CDE Technical Guidance – version 4, submitted to the ROC on January 24,...
ISDA response to ESMA MiFIR Review Consultation
On July 11, ISDA submitted a response to the European Securities and Markets Authority's (ESMA) fourth package of Level 2 consultation under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation Review (MiFIR), on transparency for derivatives, package orders and input/output data for...
Canadian Transaction Reporting Party Requirements
These Reporting Party Requirements establish the hierarchy and tie-breaker logic to determine a single reporting counterparty for Canadian provincial reporting. By leveraging the existing reporting party standard established for reporting to the CFTC, in most cases these rules facilitate submission...
ISDA In Review – June 2025
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in June 2025.