The issue of contractual continuity in the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market following the exit of the UK from the EU (referred to Brexit) is a subject of considerable concern to firms and their clients and counterparties and should, we believe, be of considerable concern to UK and EU-27 regulators and policy-makers alike.
In the context of Brexit, contractual continuity relates to existing transactions and refers to both:
- The ability to perform contractual obligations agreed under existing transactions. In other words, is it still legally permissible to perform these contractual obligations? And if not, are the contracts still valid and enforceable?
- The ability to perform other important lifecycle events (including risk management activities) for such transactions. Such lifecycle events are important both to regulators (regulatory technical standards under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation requiring market participants to seek to engage in portfolio compression exercises, for example) and market participants.
We do not believe Brexit will make it illegal for firms to perform contractual obligations under existing contracts in most (if not all) member states, and thus should not affect the legal validity of existing transactions.
However, if performance of lifecycle events on existing contracts between UK and EU-27 market participants is not legally permissible following Brexit, this is likely to impair the ability of UK and EU-27 counterparties to existing contracts to manage their exposures and risks.
Click on the attached PDF to read the full version of the paper.
Documents (1) for Contractual Continuity in OTC Derivatives
Latest
Joint Response to EBA Consultation
On August 12, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the European Banking Authority’s discussion paper on certain taxonomy key performance indicators (KPIs) and other aspects of the Disclosures Delegated Act under Article 8 of...
Response to JSCC on Clearing Fund Consolidation
On August 12, ISDA responded to the Japan Securities Clearing Corporation’s (JSCC) consultation on its proposal to consolidate clearing fund consumption, calculation and deposit segmentation across six clearing qualifications under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. ISDA members broadly support...
Response on CSDD Guidelines
On August 6, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on due diligence guidelines under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). While ISDA acknowledges that model contractual clauses can be a helpful resource for in-scope companies, there are...
Response to BoE on Extension of Settlement Hours
On August 6, ISDA responded to the Bank of England’s (BoE) consultation paper on the extension of settlement hours for RTGS and CHAPS, the UK’s high-value payment system. ISDA supports the BoE’s plan to extend RTGS and CHAPS settlement hours...
